Information

Are you saying this because you had communication with JD outside of this thread and it's your role to provide a more resolute answer than what he did in his reply? The one with the "kinda" and the "joke".

I saw you liked his original, superfluous or otherwise attention-seeking reply to my rather straightforward response to the OP. So in the instance the answer to my above question is "no"- are you saying that as a way of doubling down because it would contradict your own personal expectation of this account belonging to Doug?
It's Doug. If I have heard him say Superfluous once, i have heard him say Superfluous a million times
 
When you ask "WTF is wrong with you"- what exactly are you referencing? Or is that just an ad hominem?

Let's break down the question of you saving face. I gave a testimonial to being Doug's downline for several years. This was to help give OP relevant feedback to his specific question. You were incredulous and made the public accusation that this account belongs to Doug or would be Doug under a secondary account, but gave no evidence. This all distracted from the topic of the thread and the serious discussion relevant to this man's career. Let's say I ghosted the conversation after you made your accusation or responded in a defensive manner- regardless of any evidence being provided that this is a secondary account of Doug's there would be reason for spectators to believe that your accusation was correct. You would have gained some sort of "win" in your calling someone out on creating a fake account to give a testimonial.

However, it didn't go like that. You made a mockery of a serious question OP had that is of importance to his career, accused an agency owner of creating a fake account to give a fake testimonial, and didn't answer a single question I posed. Unless you can start supplying answers to the questions I posed then I will say that you have no honor, and someone's dishonor being exposed is enough to have them clamor to save face by claiming their otherwise serious accusation was "a joke" and deflecting. Does that answer your question?
You can't be ***ing serious?

If you are then you are a clown.

But you want to have a serious conversation.

Then back your pimping with facts.

How many lads do you get a week?

What's your average written per week.

What's your contact level?

How much do you pay for those leads each week?

What's your persistency?

Having those answers the serious minded agents you are trying to pimp to can decide if your deal is so great.


Or if it's just pumping.


You should have no problems answering those serious questions since you're the serious type that doesn't want to distract with the superfluous.

And there's no such thing as winning on an internet chat with strangers.

And it takes a real dumbass to even think there is.

I didn't think you were Doug at first. I was just making fun of your pimp post.

Now I do believe you are Doug.

So prove you are not.
 
Back
Top