Is anyone going to the Convention (National Agents Alliance) (NAA

dvd493 · Oct 6, 2006

"All politicians or crooks accept for the one who represents my district".

I've never heard that one before but it's funny

How about nobody likes attorneys until they need one. I heard that from an attorney once.

STIBROKER · Oct 7, 2006

dvd493 said:
Sti,
However, the one where you said it's an outright lie. That happens to be true. If they get coverage at a later date, they may have to go through extensive underwriting since ours are non meds. They also may have to pay more because they can be rated or declined alltogether.

thats BS......F&G has ROP's that are cheaper if you go through underwriting and f&g still has a higher rate than an AIG rop fully underwritten......whats your rate on a HC on 500,000 with a 30 year lock on a 45 male....and as far as the "pay more because they can be rated or declined alltogether" is another BS line that they shove down you and your clients throat BECAUSE a persons health is a persons health and all health conditions HAVE to be listed on the application...if they do a paramed or not.....NAA is screwing the public with thier little marketing plan and is deceiving...

dvd493 said:
Sti,
I'm sure your aware all there information has to go through legal before it's put out there. I don't know that for a fact but every other company I deal with has to so I assume they do as well.

that flyer is put out by NAA not an insurance co...(is that what your mgr. just told you)........and try this one on for size....when you put out a flyer like this and you make a reference to a insurance benifit say in this case ....the non~med and rop ...the DOI's require you to put on the flyer the name of the co's giving such benifits.... that mailer is misleading and is in violation of every marketing guidline that the DOI has....and has set you up for the lawsuit.........but thats how NAA rolls and they are the greatest thing since sliced bread.......

dvd493 · Oct 8, 2006

Sti,

You may be right. I'm not going to argue this point with you. It just seems to me that if NAA is at 100 million and your correct, they would be getting sued about that already. There pockets are deep enough for plenty of attorneys to go after them on those points. As you already know, I'm less than a year into this so who am I to judge this matter. I'll leave it to the people who know.

STIBROKER · Oct 8, 2006

dvd493 said:
Sti,
I'm less than a year into this so who am I to judge this matter. I'll leave it to the people who know.

just what the industry needs.....

dvd493 · Oct 8, 2006

What do you mean?

dvd493 · Oct 8, 2006

[email protected] said:
dvd493 said:

Sti,
I'm less than a year into this so who am I to judge this matter. I'll leave it to the people who know.

Click to expand...

just what the industry needs.....

Sti,

I don't understand what your meaning was. It could be several things. Can you clarify it please?

STIBROKER · Oct 9, 2006

dvd493 · Oct 9, 2006

I'd like to think you meant it was wise to let others judge this matter since I don't have a lot of experience with the insurance industry yet.

STIBROKER · Oct 9, 2006

rule one.....do not trust anyone in the insurance industry......

dvd493 · Oct 9, 2006

What's rule #2?

How many rules are there?

What will Sti's rules of the industry do for a person?

Is anyone going to the Convention (National Agents Alliance) (NAA

dvd493

Super Genius

STIBROKER

Like My post and enter the DRAWING,,,,

dvd493

Super Genius

STIBROKER

Like My post and enter the DRAWING,,,,

dvd493

Super Genius

dvd493

Super Genius

STIBROKER

Like My post and enter the DRAWING,,,,

dvd493

Super Genius

STIBROKER

Like My post and enter the DRAWING,,,,

dvd493

Super Genius

Similar threads

Latest posts