- 14,808
The short answer, and not just based on this article I'm posting but following this very closely - yes.
Health Care In Massachusetts: 'Abject Failure' Or Work In Progress? - Kaiser Health News
I predicted the demise of this elephant soon after its implementation in 2006. However, not without issues, it's doing just fine. 2 out of 3 MA residents approve of the law. The state has a 98% insured rate - the highest in the nation.
The immediate issue was containing costs. MA went for the throats of both providers and carriers. First denying carriers rate increases - then a study by the AGs office showing that care in "expensive" hospitals was no better and actually worst in some cases than less expensive hospitals. This meant no more higher reimbursement for hospitals who claimed they were "better" than others. AGs office said "care to prove your care is better?" They could not.
With carriers basically not able to raise rates, they went after the providers; "no soup for you" - meaning, we're not paying you a dime more. Suck it up. The hospitals sucked it up....after previously releasing media statements years ago saying they'd go BK if they were forced to accept lower payments.
Well...not really.
Many providers are now on global billing - a fixed amount per patient. So quality of care goes down? No so fast. Doctors on global billing are strictly measured and if their quality score falls below a certain number they can be kicked out as a network provider.
Doctors released press statements years ago saying they'd go out of business.
Well....not really.
Health Care In Massachusetts: 'Abject Failure' Or Work In Progress? - Kaiser Health News
I predicted the demise of this elephant soon after its implementation in 2006. However, not without issues, it's doing just fine. 2 out of 3 MA residents approve of the law. The state has a 98% insured rate - the highest in the nation.
The immediate issue was containing costs. MA went for the throats of both providers and carriers. First denying carriers rate increases - then a study by the AGs office showing that care in "expensive" hospitals was no better and actually worst in some cases than less expensive hospitals. This meant no more higher reimbursement for hospitals who claimed they were "better" than others. AGs office said "care to prove your care is better?" They could not.
With carriers basically not able to raise rates, they went after the providers; "no soup for you" - meaning, we're not paying you a dime more. Suck it up. The hospitals sucked it up....after previously releasing media statements years ago saying they'd go BK if they were forced to accept lower payments.
Well...not really.
Many providers are now on global billing - a fixed amount per patient. So quality of care goes down? No so fast. Doctors on global billing are strictly measured and if their quality score falls below a certain number they can be kicked out as a network provider.
Doctors released press statements years ago saying they'd go out of business.
Well....not really.
Last edited: