If you look at it as a transfer of assets from a 1-2% CD into a life insurance policy, then it's not really an expense. Being treated as a life insurance policy means the heirs receive a death benefit which is more than the premium itself.
I see both sides to this, but find it hard to do an apples to apples comparison since they are different products.
I wish I was more of an LTC expert and might find myself moving in this direction once health and Medicare sales become ancient history.
Rick
The problem with the way the MG product is usually sold is that it rarely includes an inflation benefit.
So, you've got a product with "so so" long-term care benefits and so-so death benefits.
It's great for people who like beige.
I say "so so" death benefits because the death benefit is reduced if they make a long-term care claim on the policy before they die.
For about the same premium, you could get much better LTCi benefits (with a single pay LTCi policy) AND a single-pay whole life policy that would NOT be diminished if they made a claim on the LTCi policy.