I live in Snow Bird City, AZ very close to the Mexico boarder which might change a few things when comparing whether or not an MA or Med sup plan is better since it diminishes some of the "extra perk value" of the MA plans, but I'm not sure, and would appreciate some thoughts.
I am new to this, but am only doing it part time (was considering going for the big AEP push, but with all the CMS crap early on, decided not to). My main client base is family and their friends since my parents, grandparents and their friends are all on original medicare, and obviously I want to put them on the plan that's best for them.
Of the MA plans, the best one is the 0 premium PPO, has $10 Dr co-pay, $500 hospital co-pay, no co-pay for basic preventative/routine care, $50 ER co-pay, MOOP is $2800, no part D. Since we are so close to Mexico, the vision, dental and hearing benefits from the plan, cost the same as they pay in Mexico and they don't see them as an extra benefit.
Med Sup Plan F is what seems comparative in coverage. With everything covered and the premium $2800, if all benefits are used from either plan, the cost in the end seems it would be the same for the client.
Obviously if someone is in good health, and only needs preventitive/routine care the PPO plan would be better and save money unless something happened. But there is no risk in getting it since the MOOP is the same as the Med Sup F premium. I know there is a discount if someone enrolls in the Med Sup early, and if they're not in good health and would use the MOOP of the MA plan, the Med Sup would be cheaper. Other than that, is there an advantage to going with one over the other?
(Other than not having to deal with the CMS BS)
I am new to this, but am only doing it part time (was considering going for the big AEP push, but with all the CMS crap early on, decided not to). My main client base is family and their friends since my parents, grandparents and their friends are all on original medicare, and obviously I want to put them on the plan that's best for them.
Of the MA plans, the best one is the 0 premium PPO, has $10 Dr co-pay, $500 hospital co-pay, no co-pay for basic preventative/routine care, $50 ER co-pay, MOOP is $2800, no part D. Since we are so close to Mexico, the vision, dental and hearing benefits from the plan, cost the same as they pay in Mexico and they don't see them as an extra benefit.
Med Sup Plan F is what seems comparative in coverage. With everything covered and the premium $2800, if all benefits are used from either plan, the cost in the end seems it would be the same for the client.
Obviously if someone is in good health, and only needs preventitive/routine care the PPO plan would be better and save money unless something happened. But there is no risk in getting it since the MOOP is the same as the Med Sup F premium. I know there is a discount if someone enrolls in the Med Sup early, and if they're not in good health and would use the MOOP of the MA plan, the Med Sup would be cheaper. Other than that, is there an advantage to going with one over the other?
(Other than not having to deal with the CMS BS)