Hey Guy,
I have no argument with you and sure as hell have no desire to get into a pissing contest. Actually I really didn't even know what you were talking about. I surely wasn't trying to bust your ass. I just typed what I thought was an innocent response.
You said the client has to contact the carrier and I said the client doesn't have to. Had we said, one way of canceling a policy is to contact the carrier, another way is just to stop paying premiums, this probably would have never come up.
There are two companies that more than just a couple of times have not stopped the bank draft on the day my new client requested and they had to request a refund. Maybe I'm just lucky that way, but I have had it happen more than just a few times.
Now who's having a bad day?
You're right. I guess I wasn't clear enough. I was simply stating that just because someone fills out a replacement form doesn't mean the old policy gets canceled. The client still has to initiate it. Whether it's through a phone call or, as you do, by having them go to the bank to stop their draft. I wasn't stating that the client was REQUIRED to contact the carrier. Just that they have to do something. And in this case, I prefer to have the cleitn contact the carrier. However, if they just do nothing, they will continue paying for the old supp. Which we all know, a person can't have more than one supp.
I'm not trying to argue with you Frank. I stated something and you somewhat rebutted it. When I replied to your rebuttal, you seemed to have gotten a little angry. No need. I think we both understand what the other was trying to state now.