My how the Tables Have Turned...

[AgentOrange]

I see. So we were just having a general conversation about immigrants?

Regardless of how the topic arose, you made uplifting statements about how immigrants had benefitted new jersey and the educational level of immigrants was higher too.

I simply asked whether you had data on illegal immigrants.

From there the crabwalk and hyper-defensiveness began. Hey, if you don't know or the data detracts from your attempt to use data for all immigrants to portray a peppier picture for illegals - then just say so.

If you want to say "hey the educational level for illegals sucks" but I know you guys are just having an academic discussion about immigrants in general, then do that. We are used to seeing you off in la-la land while the conversation is focused on something else.

Personally, since your comment arose in response to a video of rioting in Germany, I am thinking it was about inundations by illegals, or hastily accepted legal refugees. Not just computer programmer from India going to silicon valley. But hey, that's just me. Maybe others see that video of the mob scenes and think that there is just a general discussion of immigrants.

You have own special little world going there if you do.

So all you are telling me is your ability to interpret my response to Fex is flawed. We all know this common to you.

So I shall explain, as I try to be patient with the ignorant. Fex posted a video of riots in Germany by immigrants and asked if I wanted this in NJ, specifically Trenton and Camden. I responded back with the facts that NJ has an excellent, thriving and contributing immigrant population. We have not had immigrants rioting in NJ. As a matter of fact, quite the opposite.

Where you construed there is a relevant point about illegal crime data being necessary to the conversation is your business, but it has nothing to do with the original topic or where the conversation was going.

So with that I will tell you the same thing I told you last time, if you have a point to make then make it.

But, if your goal is to change the subject to make an argument on grounds you feel safe discussing, don't expect me to follow you down that path just because you're insecure about topics beyond your narrow point of view.

 

[Winter_123]

Where you construed there is a relevant point about illegal crime data being necessary to the conversation is your business, but it has nothing to do with the original topic or where the conversation was going.

.

I see. I did not ask a question that was part of your plan and script. Shame on me.

You made positive points about illegals and cited some data. I simply asked if you had data for illegal immigrants rather than immigrants. Again, you started that immigrants have a higher level of education- maybe that was Jersey specific, I dont remember, and I think that is bullshiite and you are using generic immigrant data to flim-flam us about illegals.

Now -again- instead of just providing the data or saying that you don't have it admitting that you dont know what the data is for illegals- you go in circles crabwalking again for another day. The fault today I guess is that I failed to understand where the conversation came from or where it was going. Yeh, okay, you have the data or not? If you are still trying to make the point that illegal immigrants are part of a more highly educated group, then say that. If not, then get honest. Your flim-flam is not going to work but you have bee given every opportunity to produce more data rather than your dishonest attempt.




So you are failing on the first assignment and cannot produce the immigration data.

Where are you on the second assignment: To produce the post where I said that "Trump is socialism for whites." You said yesterday you coulnd find it because you just had your iphone to search with and needed to get back to your desk. Fine. Where is it now?

 

[AgentOrange]

I see. I did not ask a question that was part of your plan and script. Shame on me.

You made positive points about illegals and cited some data. I simply asked if you had data for illegal immigrants rather than immigrants. Again, you started that immigrants have a higher level of education- maybe that was Jersey specific, I dont remember, and I think that is bullshiite and you are using generic immigrant data to flim-flam us about illegals.

Now -again- instead of just providing the data or saying that you don't have it admitting that you dont know what the data is for illegals- you go in circles crabwalking again for another day. The fault today I guess is that I failed to understand where the conversation came from or where it was going. Yeh, okay, you have the data or not? If you are still trying to make the point that illegal immigrants are part of a more highly educated group, then say that. If not, then get honest. Your flim-flam is not going to work but you have bee given every opportunity to produce more data rather than your dishonest attempt.




So you are failing on the first assignment and cannot produce the immigration data.

Where are you on the second assignment: To produce the post where I said that "Trump is socialism for whites." You said yesterday you coulnd find it because you just had your iphone to search with and needed to get back to your desk. Fine. Where is it now?

Again, you fail to comprehend the words in front of your face. The point I made wasn't about "illegals", it was about immigration in NJ in response to Fex's question.

Get a brain, dumbass.

 

[Winter_123]

Again, you fail to comprehend the words in front of your face. The point I made wasn't about "illegals", it was about immigration in NJ in response to Fex's question.

Get a brain, dumbass.

Right. Fex asked if you wanted to see the kind of lawless, mob as in Germany start happening in Germany.

So you pointed out- among other things- that immigrants there have a higher level of educational attainment as a means of trying to put a positive spin on the immigrant situation. I SIMPLY ASKED WHETHER THAT DATA WAS BROKEN DOWN SO THAT WE COULD SEE EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS VERSUS IMMIGRANTS IN GENERAL.

From there you went nuts, and either cannot produce that data or pretend that it is not relevant. Obviously you believe that data would not help your spin, otherwise you would not have put this much effort into trying to make the question go away.


How is that other assignment about Trump and socialism for whites coming along. Your search engines running in the background? When can I expect to see that?

 

[AgentOrange]

Right. Fex asked if you wanted to see the kind of lawless, mob as in Germany start happening in Germany.

So you pointed out- among other things- that immigrants there have a higher level of educational attainment as a means of trying to put a positive spin on the immigrant situation. I SIMPLY ASKED WHETHER THAT DATA WAS BROKEN DOWN SO THAT WE COULD SEE EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS VERSUS IMMIGRANTS IN GENERAL.

From there you went nuts, and either cannot produce that data or pretend that it is not relevant. Obviously you believe that data would not help your spin, otherwise you would not have put this much effort into trying to make the question go away.


How is that other assignment about Trump and socialism for whites coming along. Your search engines running in the background? When can I expect to see that?

Winter, how long are going to continuously lie about this? You know you made that statement and so do I. Again, you think there is some vast audience here watching you bend your arguments into pretzels to fit down your latest rabbit hole, there's not. It's only a handful of us.

We all know you said of Trump's economic policies they're "socialism for white people." If you think you're getting some points for dragging this out keep going, but we all know you're lying.

 

[Winter_123]

Winter, how long are going to continuously lie about this? You know you made that statement and so do I? Again, you think their is some vast audience here watching bend your arguments into pretzels, there's not. It's only a handful of us.

We all know you said of Trump's economic policies they're "socialism for white people." If you think you're getting some points for dragging this out keep going, but we all know you're lying.

"We all know"

Ahhh, no "we" don't. All we know is that you said it but could not find it because all you had was your iphone and needed "to be at your desk." Looks like there is "zero chance" you are going to find it with your computer either. "Zero chance" is the story of your life.

Looks like just one more lie from you. Another day, another lie.

 

[AgentOrange]

"We all know"

Ahhh, no "we" don't. All we know is that you said it but could not find it because all you had was your iphone and needed "to be at your desk." Looks like there is "zero chance" you are going to find it with your computer either. "Zero chance" is the story of your life.

Looks like just one more lie from you. Another day, another lie.

Do you deny saying you said "socialism for white people"?

 

[Winter_123]

Do you deny saying you said "socialism for white people"?

Not able to find it yet?

 

[AgentOrange]

Not able to find it yet?

So you ready to admit you're a liar?

 

[Winter_123]

So you ready to admit you're a liar?

I am ready to review the post from which you allegedly quoted me. Are you ready to post that here yet?

Or your search engines still running in the background?