- 4,096
This is an approach I have come up with for 2009 for small groups. This pitch is really for groups under 10.
Take a standard group plan with co pays with 9 people on the plan. I am going to pitch individual HSA plans. I know that is not anything new but here is where I go with it.
The employee know is responsible for the premium (tough sale to the employee) but the the employer now funds the HSA account. So the employee now should not have any out of pocket when it comes to claims. Obviously we hope there is roll over every year.
So now the employer knows what they will spend each year on HSA contributions and there will not be any large rate increases. This approach should cut the cost of insurance in half for the employer.
Deal breakers for this pitch
If the employee is uninsurable...In my state we have a high risk pool plan where an HSA is an option. The dilemma this creates with a family is we now might have a higher out of pocket with 2 HSA plan in place for the family.
Maternity coverage. This is a real deal breaker. The individual plan that has no waiting period for this coverage is Assurant but there is a separate $5,000 or $10,000 deductible. Still going to cost the client at least $7,000 for a child birth.
This would really upset an employee.
I think this might work for small groups that are getting double digit rate increases that are thinking of dropping coverage.
Please do not post this in the individual forum as some newbie might set themselves up for failure trying to put this approach in place.
Feedback?
Take a standard group plan with co pays with 9 people on the plan. I am going to pitch individual HSA plans. I know that is not anything new but here is where I go with it.
The employee know is responsible for the premium (tough sale to the employee) but the the employer now funds the HSA account. So the employee now should not have any out of pocket when it comes to claims. Obviously we hope there is roll over every year.
So now the employer knows what they will spend each year on HSA contributions and there will not be any large rate increases. This approach should cut the cost of insurance in half for the employer.
Deal breakers for this pitch
If the employee is uninsurable...In my state we have a high risk pool plan where an HSA is an option. The dilemma this creates with a family is we now might have a higher out of pocket with 2 HSA plan in place for the family.
Maternity coverage. This is a real deal breaker. The individual plan that has no waiting period for this coverage is Assurant but there is a separate $5,000 or $10,000 deductible. Still going to cost the client at least $7,000 for a child birth.
This would really upset an employee.
I think this might work for small groups that are getting double digit rate increases that are thinking of dropping coverage.
Please do not post this in the individual forum as some newbie might set themselves up for failure trying to put this approach in place.
Feedback?