- 15,041
I have a three different securities licensed professionals who handle various investments... each has a different "specialty" or "orientation" if you will... one is a stock-bond gal, one is a funds guy and the third preaches limited partnerships and more esoteric types of investments for people with assets.
My funds gay is always telling me about the "new" VAs and how terrific they are... especially one by Met. Well, the frickin' prospectus (yeah, I read them... I really do) is like 500 pages. [editorial]My feeling is that IF it takes a small book to explain and disclose a financial product it is "all FOR" the company and NOT "in the interest" of the client!!! [/editorial]
Can you explain in a couple of paragraphs for the compete *** why these new VAs are really "blue smoke and mirrors." I don't have one, don't plan to have one, but I'd like to know the major downsides of these new products so that I can "ask quesitons" to people who DO have them. Legally we agents can't really "talk" about VAs... but we can say "You should ask your broker about ...... and listen to what she says and let me know."
Thanks.
Actually, I really liked the Met VA, although I understand it is undergoing some changes and won't be as good. And the reason it takes 500 pages is because of regulators and lawyers.
But basically, don't put money into the Met VA with the GMIB unless you are willing to "annuitize" it. You'll never see that money again as a lump sum, until you die. What is nice is the death benefit rider that you could add to it. Basically leave your spouse the amount of the benefit base and not the contract value. When it was all said and done, the Met VA B share had about 3% in fees. Very unlikely you'd get many market step-ups.