- 120
Have you ever seen an IUL illustration? Or a UL illustration?
It really helps to read it and it will answer a lot of questions for you.
You need to realize that you are making blanket statements/assumptions when in reality the answer is situation specific.
There are yearly admin costs (which decrease drastically over the life of the policy) plus the yearly "Cost of Insurance" (COI) (which increases at a very small rate over the life of the policy).
These yearly fees are paid from the Premium; if there is a Premium Payment that year.
The remaining amount is what earns interest.
But most overfunded IUL policies are not set up to pay premiums forever. Most people stop around retirement age.
So in the case of a negative year in the market; if no Premiums were paid, then it is possible that the Cash Value could decrease due to the costs associated with the policy.
BUT, even this scenario depends on the specific policy at hand.
Many IULs provide a Guaranteed 1% Yearly Interest Rate if the Index falls below 1% for the year.
So for a policy that provides a yearly min. guarantee; it would not loose any CV because the 1% min would cover the expenses for that year.
So how a negative Index year will affect an IUL depends on the situation.
But if Premiums are paid that year, then the costs will always (as far as im aware of) come out of the Premium.
You are making blanket assumptions from a quick off the cuff answer that he probably did not have time to fully explain given the time constraints of the web show.
Whenever you make a blanket statement in this industry it is almost always just half-correct.
Yes I have seen an IUL illustration. I have not studied it nor gained a solid understanding of it. Nor am I confident that such a study would in any way make me an expert on universal life policies in general.
Hence I appreciate you taking the time to offer some in-depth explanation.
When I began my comments on this thread, I wanted to air some of the thoughts and sort out some of what I've been picking up. You know much better than I how complex even one category of product can be. Add to this complexity, all the other information surrounding these topics, the stories of problems solved and difficulties faced and, well, at least it takes me time to get any kind of handle on it all. Or even some of it.
As my thoughts came together, I became less concerned with how insurance is defined as pertaining to "investment" than how the unique properties and position of insurance fit in the lives of my potential prospects and clients.
In short, I find my own comments moot.
I'd say my own energies are better spent learning how to best utilize these tools to benefit and serve my prospects and clients.
In fairness to Brandon, after reviewing the segment I referred to, I could not see where he made any remarks I attributed to him. Neither was my characterization accurate. One reason I really dislike reciting from memory -- memories of eyewitness accounts tend to fault on fact.
It was Steven Savant who said on "Income Scenarios (The Competition Desk Series)" (at about 6:50 minutes into the segment -- paraphrased) that telling prospects "you'll never lose any money" could get us as agents could get us in a lot of trouble.
Thanks again for your comments.
Andy