- Thread starter
- #11
- 2,152
I fail to see how a WL CV becomes a 'retirement' vehicle. Whatever you borrow out of it simply reduces the DB, plus you have to pay interest on it.
Don't you think an annuity is a better vehicle for retirement than WL? I'm not saying one should dump their WL but some people at age 70 will be insurance 'rich' and cash poor... being worth more dead than alive (which is sort of a sad commentary on how they managed their money, but the truth is the truth.)
I'm not trying to be flip here. Just trying to learn what James is trying to teach us.
Al
I'm not much of a teacher, just ranting about how I view selling life. As far as WL not being a retirement plan, totally agree! Yet, I thought I was quite specific about my views of retirement? Now what I stated was a few years in the very latter part of life if other retirement money is failing, which looking at most retirement plans and their obvious outcome, this is very likely. That is only if the person set up a lucrative retirement fund, which is also unlikely!
Now with WL you have a built in emergency fund that we all like to call the Cash Value which can if not needed for business, depending upon funding of the policy a few years of partial retirement or vacations.
No way did I mean to apply that WL is a Retirement fund, yet it is very possible that most will go thru their Real Retirement fund (whatever that may be) way before they die, at least on average that is very likely. Now if one is in their 40's starting their WL or UL policy and was loyal to it, after 40 years likely the CV has likely grown quite significantly. Are Annuities better if specifically brought for retirement? Yea, I'm sure they are and I'm not oppose to them at all, just wasn't talking about them or funding retirement specifically now was I? You getting ahead of the class Al, I know you're not happy with me but please don't be a Bad Noodle Al, try and be more attentive okay.
Ps; plus I haven't gotten into the whole "Life Value" discussion yet either!
Last edited: