- 6,013
Ut Oh . . .
My attorney and I just finished a conference call (yes - on friggin Labor Day) about voice broadcasting laws.
Houston we have a problem . . .
The ruling found here:
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2008/08/R411001tsrfrn.pdf
. . . specifies "consumers" not being contacted - not just "residential consumers" . . .
The interpretation we've concluded to be law is that ALL calls to "consumers" without prior permission will be illegal with voice broadcasting - whether that consumer answers a residential phone or a business phone.
This is HUGE . . .
We have run this all the way up the flag pole over the last week and it's clearly stated many times "consumer" - not once does it mention a "residential" phone line - ut oh . . .
As of today - we are out of the voice broadcasting business - too much risk to bend the rules . . .
Good luck to everyone.
Tom
My attorney and I just finished a conference call (yes - on friggin Labor Day) about voice broadcasting laws.
Houston we have a problem . . .
The ruling found here:
http://www.ftc.gov/os/2008/08/R411001tsrfrn.pdf
. . . specifies "consumers" not being contacted - not just "residential consumers" . . .
The interpretation we've concluded to be law is that ALL calls to "consumers" without prior permission will be illegal with voice broadcasting - whether that consumer answers a residential phone or a business phone.
This is HUGE . . .
We have run this all the way up the flag pole over the last week and it's clearly stated many times "consumer" - not once does it mention a "residential" phone line - ut oh . . .
As of today - we are out of the voice broadcasting business - too much risk to bend the rules . . .
Good luck to everyone.
Tom