St. Pete Times Editoral...12/7/2008

Advantage, insurance companies

As a candidate, President-elect Barack Obama singled out the elimination of Medicare Advantage subsidies as one of the ways his administration would economize. Now, new studies reinforce the waste associated with those payments, leaving little reason to continue the program.
Under Medicare Advantage, the government pays private health insurers substantially more to cover clients' health care costs than what the government spends under traditional Medicare to directly pay doctors and hospitals. On average, the Advantage plans cost 13 percent more, and about a quarter of the nation's 44-million Medicare beneficiaries currently subscribe to one.
The popularity of these plans is linked to heavy advertising and enticements such as added vision coverage or gym memberships. In 2003, a Republican-led Congress increased payments to Advantage plan providers. Since then, billions of dollars have been directed into private sector profits that could have been spent on direct care for Medicare beneficiaries.
The increased costs were supposed to be justified by market efficiencies and improved health for recipients that ostensibly would come from private competition and increased enrollment in health maintenance organizations. But a new analysis by Marsha Gold at Mathematica Policy Research Inc. and posted on the Web site Health Affairs, says that there are no apparent gains in the quality of care in the Advantage plans. Plus, additional spending for Advantage plans continues to reduce the solvency of the Medicare trust fund. It is estimated that added Advantage costs subtracts 18 months from the life of the fund, which is currently projected to run out of money by about 2019.
Beyond taxpayers, the added costs are also borne by the current enrollees in traditional Medicare whose monthly premiums increased by an estimated $3 to pay for the Advantage subsidies, according to research by members of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, an independent congressional agency.
It is no surprise that the Advantage plans' primary beneficiaries are the insurance companies that offer them. According to Bloomberg.com, three large health insurance companies, including WellCare Health Plans Inc. of Tampa, attribute more than 80 percent of their earnings to the receipts from Medicare Advantage.
Talk about counterproductive. Scarce Medicare dollars are bolstering the bottom lines of middlemen instead of paying for health care for elderly and disabled Americans. The Obama administration and congressional Democrats should move quickly to reduce Medicare Advantage premium payments and eventually eliminate them. If the private sector wants to compete with government, then it should do so without a taxpayer-funded bonus.
 
Advantage, insurance companies

As a candidate, President-elect Barack Obama singled out the elimination of Medicare Advantage subsidies as one of the ways his administration would economize. Now, new studies reinforce the waste associated with those payments, leaving little reason to continue the program.
Under Medicare Advantage, the government pays private health insurers substantially more to cover clients' health care costs than what the government spends under traditional Medicare to directly pay doctors and hospitals. On average, the Advantage plans cost 13 percent more, and about a quarter of the nation's 44-million Medicare beneficiaries currently subscribe to one.
The popularity of these plans is linked to heavy advertising and enticements such as added vision coverage or gym memberships. In 2003, a Republican-led Congress increased payments to Advantage plan providers. Since then, billions of dollars have been directed into private sector profits that could have been spent on direct care for Medicare beneficiaries.
The increased costs were supposed to be justified by market efficiencies and improved health for recipients that ostensibly would come from private competition and increased enrollment in health maintenance organizations. But a new analysis by Marsha Gold at Mathematica Policy Research Inc. and posted on the Web site Health Affairs, says that there are no apparent gains in the quality of care in the Advantage plans. Plus, additional spending for Advantage plans continues to reduce the solvency of the Medicare trust fund. It is estimated that added Advantage costs subtracts 18 months from the life of the fund, which is currently projected to run out of money by about 2019.
Beyond taxpayers, the added costs are also borne by the current enrollees in traditional Medicare whose monthly premiums increased by an estimated $3 to pay for the Advantage subsidies, according to research by members of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, an independent congressional agency.
It is no surprise that the Advantage plans' primary beneficiaries are the insurance companies that offer them. According to Bloomberg.com, three large health insurance companies, including WellCare Health Plans Inc. of Tampa, attribute more than 80 percent of their earnings to the receipts from Medicare Advantage.
Talk about counterproductive. Scarce Medicare dollars are bolstering the bottom lines of middlemen instead of paying for health care for elderly and disabled Americans. The Obama administration and congressional Democrats should move quickly to reduce Medicare Advantage premium payments and eventually eliminate them. If the private sector wants to compete with government, then it should do so without a taxpayer-funded bonus.

Yup. This has been the trajectory of MA's for the last couple years. The only thing that would have turned it around is if McCain had been elected. The rest is or will be history.

The other factor of course is that Congress needs/wants to continue to raid reiminbursements to MA's to prevent planned cuts to the reimbursement rates for physicians. AARP pushes MA's out of one side of their shop while the other side of the shop lobbies to get funding for them moved over to physician reimbursements. Probably Congress will avoid the fallout from eliminating MA's by just continuing to cut the reimbursement level for them and then just letting the carriers do what they can with fewer dollars, which of course means that most of them will go away unless you want to buy an MA for a handful of dollars less than a supp.

Winter
 
According to Bloomberg.com, three large health insurance companies, including WellCare Health Plans Inc. of Tampa, attribute more than 80 percent of their earnings to the receipts from Medicare Advantage.
That's really the silver lining. WellCare will go under. Terrible management, dishonest marketing.

Rick
 
The St. Petersburg Times, while one of America's top papers, and Florida's largest, has always had a very strong liberal viewpoint.

Right, wrong or indifferent, you really can't expect any other point of view from them...
 
Won't happen.

AARP said that they back MA plans as long as they are paid at 100% of the capitation fee and no more.

Eliminate MA plans and you eliminate a revenue source for AARP, and they will not like that.
 
Won't happen.

AARP said that they back MA plans as long as they are paid at 100% of the capitation fee and no more.

Eliminate MA plans and you eliminate a revenue source for AARP, and they will not like that.

If the goal is to expand health care, why would you scrap a program that is in place and working?

I don't think these plans will be history. Maybe more cost controlled, but not scrapped. Being able to negotiate the prices of drugs may be a step in the right cost-conserving direction.
 
Typical editoral, this person never talked to a senior who got wacked with a huge CAT scan bill or a bunch of doctors bills that kept them up at night. I've sat at the kithcen tables of these seniors and it's very sad, many are on such a tight budget and any illness or problem and there underwater. Most of these MA plans will pay for preventive testing, limit the cost of the big test and put a cap on annual costs. These ploticians and so-call journalits never talk about the crying senior who worked hard there whole life and have to decide between food and healthcare expences.
These plans work. Original Medicare is based on a 40 year old model....not todays cost. Lets help the seniors, there the ones who put into the sytem in the first place.
 
An editorial means squat. It's whatever their political leanings are. Medicare is rife with fraud and waste. As stated, with original Medicare, a person with a stroke would go bankrupt.

Supplements are over-insuring. It's stupid to pay a premium for small ticket items in health care. All anyone needs is catastophic and then maintenance coverage.

Rather than pay a premium, I would rather bank the money and pay the 20%. Bet I come out ahead.
 
An editorial means squat. It's whatever their political leanings are. Medicare is rife with fraud and waste. As stated, with original Medicare, a person with a stroke would go bankrupt.

Supplements are over-insuring. It's stupid to pay a premium for small ticket items in health care. All anyone needs is catastophic and then maintenance coverage.

Rather than pay a premium, I would rather bank the money and pay the 20%. Bet I come out ahead.


High deductible F is suitable for many, maybe not for the agent though.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top