whatyouwantfinally
Guru
- 524
That gives Congress the power to make bankruptcy courts/laws, not an individual right to have debts discharged.
Supreme ct struck down free loans . Biden had zero authority to do
- Thread starter DonP
- Start date
That gives Congress the power to make bankruptcy courts/laws, not an individual right to have debts discharged.
Now go read what the founding father's say about the right to discharge debt which... is what bankruptcy is in their letters, the Federalist Papers, and one of the reasons quoted for rebelling.
- 5,463
I hear you guys talking about forgiving debt, but was that really what's happening?
The way I look at it, forgiving the college debt is ultimately subsidizing an educational system that's already bloated and completely taking advantage of young people.
Furthermore, the auto industry, trade unions and farming business has plenty of in demand well paying jobs that aren't going anywhere. Most of those jobs don't need a college degree.
The way I look at it, forgiving the college debt is ultimately subsidizing an educational system that's already bloated and completely taking advantage of young people.
Furthermore, the auto industry, trade unions and farming business has plenty of in demand well paying jobs that aren't going anywhere. Most of those jobs don't need a college degree.
- 5,463
Don't pick on her. She is Native American, you racist!
Sir, you are continuing to show your ignorance of the issue, you may want to go back and edit your posts. As said earlier in this thread, the Article and Section you referred to does not inure rights to the individual. Also, just because there is mention in the Federalist Papers does not mean it is a right. The Federalist Papers are a collection of essays the founding fathers used as a way to communicate and debate differing points of view.
The federalist papers are the foundational texts of the Constitution. They are typically used as a way to interpret the Constitution and often quoted by the Supreme Court.
In Prentz vs the US, the Federalist Papers were cited 35 times regarding provisions of the Brady amendment being unconstitutional per the 10th amendment.
I suggest you may want to go back and edit your post regarding the ignorance concerning foundational documents used by jurists to interpret the Constitution.
In Prentz vs the US, the Federalist Papers were cited 35 times regarding provisions of the Brady amendment being unconstitutional per the 10th amendment.
I suggest you may want to go back and edit your post regarding the ignorance concerning foundational documents used by jurists to interpret the Constitution.
Yes, they were used as foundational documents, and yes some jurists use it to help interpret the Constitution, but that does not mean that every issue outlined in the paper(s) is a right.
But if it’s written into the Constitution and expanded upon in the Federalist Papers as well as other founding documents, then it is meant to be a right.
Literally the definition of a right.
And yes, all jurists except far left wing use the federalist papers.
The founding fathers specifically put in that congress will make laws for bankruptcy. Coupled with the federalist papers dictating that the US is a place to start over financially, and most of our ancestors were running from debts in England by coming to America; it was obviously a passionate issue to them as well as a reason to rebel.
Literally the definition of a right.
And yes, all jurists except far left wing use the federalist papers.
The founding fathers specifically put in that congress will make laws for bankruptcy. Coupled with the federalist papers dictating that the US is a place to start over financially, and most of our ancestors were running from debts in England by coming to America; it was obviously a passionate issue to them as well as a reason to rebel.
A right is something found in the constitution. And yes, the Federalist Papers were used as a vehicle by which the drafters would put forth their views on the issue and influence voters to accept the issue into the Constitution. But your earlier comment that the individual has a right to bankruptcy is just not true. Article 1, Section 8 gives the Congress the right to decide how to handle bankruptcy. IT DOES NOT GIVE ANY RIGHT TO THE INDIVIUDAL.
