How could Dems vote against this HSA bill
Uh, maybe because poor people don't save money, don't fund HSA's, and have no clue how a high deductible plan works?
Oh, and they don't pay income taxes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How could Dems vote against this HSA bill
Perhaps I misunderstood you. I presumed you were one of those people who claim health care is a RIGHT (which it isn't).
I see it this way. The poor don't always remain poor. They aspire for higher income and half will reach it some day, and will want tax breaks and savings vehicles as they escalate. And if it's a good for 80% of tax paying America now, why not vote yes?
The bill allows for premiums to be paid from the HSA. If they pay any premium, they probably pay some taxes.
It also equals out the tax code for ifp people vs employer plan deductions.
And, The bill does NOT require a HDHP plan.
And who says the state govt won't or can't fund the HSA for the low income, and put them in charge of allocating assets.
----------------------
This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to modify the requirements for health savings accounts (HSAs) to:
increase the maximum contribution amounts,
permit the use of HSAs to pay health insurance premiums and direct primary care expenses,
repeal the restriction on using HSAs for over-the-counter medications,
eliminate the requirement that a participant in an HSA be enrolled in a high deductible health care plan, and
decrease the additional tax for HSA distributions not used for qualified medical expenses.
----------
People may not be using them as savings accounts for the future, but a little education goes a long way, just like the 401k education cycle. HSA's have only been around for 10 years, and this is one hell of a graph in the right direction.
Not Much Saving Going on in Health Savings Accounts | Investing News | US News
The poor don't always remain poor. They aspire for higher income and half will reach it some day, and will want tax breaks and savings vehicles as they escalate. And if it's a good for 80% of tax paying America now, why not vote yes?
From this formal point of view, appears it isn't, and it is. Why? How you can be Free (freedom right), if you should go to work somewhere only because you can't afford to protect your health? You can't start your own business, because of it. Are you really Free?
Also we are at a point where the entire world wonders about healthcare price rates here, and someone commented that because we have the best service with 250,000 dead every year because of medical mistakes?
We will be sitting on our problem until it becomes unsustainable. This is what it is, this is how things come to a change.
----------
Yagents, HSA is not a magic pill! From the above, it sounds to me like healing with aspirin all sicknesses. I would like to be so simple, but it isn't. I've been a big proponent of HSA from the time it came on this market, but it doesn't work for everybody. It means savings for people who know how to navigate it, and it means barrier for insolvency for low income people, but still expensive, and people do not understand it. If I am offered $100/month with 10,000 deductible, basic preventive care free, I'll be happy. Is there something like this?
There would be under the new laws. If good for you and me, then good for millions of others. Stop searching for magic pill, it's a number of smaller changes nibbling around the edges to get to the core.
You are preaching to the choir, Bill. But I do have a different opinion about the poor. Most of them will remain poor because they have poor money management skills and don't care to learn them.
Then there are those who like being on the govt dole which is the way Democrats like it. More govt handouts = more people who vote D.
Almost everyone of the social programs designed to help the poor have led to more govt dependence, not less. LBJ's Great Society has created more poor people than almost any other movement.
His "war on poverty" was as successful as the "war on drugs".
Both campaigns have been a complete flop and a rat hole where our tax dollars go.
"Those people" are all fat, stupid, lazy, and ignorant, right? Yes, that's right. It is so good to finally hear someone speak the truth.
All those people in Kentucky, West Virginia, Tennessee, Western Pennsylvania, Western Maryland, and South Western Virginia are all Democrats? Who knew? I surely didn't. Lesson learned. Thank you for that.
Yeah, we really should abolish Medicare and Medicaid and food stamps... and college funding... because we who have the money don't want to pay for it. Honestly, why on earth should we to do anything for anyone who is less affluent than we are. Greed is good, right? That's what I've been told.
Absolutely. Let 'em eat cake, right? Better yet just let 'em starve to death... or bleed out... and, as Dickens wrote "and decrease the surplus population." Right on, brother!
Thank you for talking 'straight' about all those poor (and often sick) people. You did a great service for all of us here. As they say in your part of the country, "Bless your little heart."
Spoken like a true Wacko Lib Shakespeare. When will you begin donating your salary and all of your worldly goods to charity?