- Thread starter
- #11
- 11,457
This regulation only applies to qualified retirement plans funding annuities.
It does not apply to life insurance.
It does not apply to life insurance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow. Very interesting. Both the agent and carrier must go down as a written Fiduciary. This will thin the heard a good bit most likely. Which is not necessarily all that bad of a thing if the change is incremental.
As I stated a while back, nothing really changes, it just gets more complicated and more expensive.
Absolutely. In a Fiduciary environment it's impossible to justify giving the agent huge percentages of a client's returns. Say goodbye to products with huge comp. Most of them suck anyway... which is why they can afford to pay huge comp.
This regulation only applies to qualified retirement plans funding annuities.
It does not apply to life insurance.
are you strictly talking annuitties .. or LI as well ?
and how does the DOL define "huge comp" ... kind of scary.. if they start telling insurance company what to pay us ..
The consumer will pay.
----------
Agents deserve to be highly compensated. Insurance companies should pay as much as they can to the agent and still remain competitive.
The average consumer is out of touch and only willing to pay $75-100 for financial advice. That probably explains why the average consumer typically will not be prepared for retirement.
This has nothing to do with consumers willingness to pay for advice. Consumers did not push for this regulation and annuity comp is a soft cost to the client, not a hard cost.
This is my point. The backend comp charge is preferred by most middle income clients. The regulators are preparing to remove all commission and transition to fees. We have a difficult time getting middle income clients to plan for their retirement with the backend fees. I predict less will pay an upfront fee and the market will not be served.
The market with $2 million and willing to pay a 0.50 annual management fee will continue to be served. The incentives are not there for a client with $100K unless they are willing to spend a few thousand dollars for a plan. A few hundred dollars will not work and they will not receive any guidance. They will probably need to go with a robo advisor and hope for the best. In the long run, the middle income consumer will suffer by the acts of regulators trying to protect them.
The question is, would you take on a 50-100k client if you had level comp on an annuity or were charging a fee in a 3rd party or robo portfolio? With this new legislation, the ability for that client to sue you and win becomes more likely.
That, imho, is why this market will become more underserved than it already is.
So, how do you negate the risk?
1. Have a written plan. I'm not talking about a 50-100 page special. Just 3-10 pages maximum.
Page 1 - assumptions
Page 2 - current situation
Page 3 - proposed solution
2. Know how to defend your recommendations compared to anything else YOU work with. Why would you choose your preferred companies over others.
3. Return phone calls and if you make an error, fix it as quickly as possible.
I don't think it's that hard to avoid a lawsuit. The person with the most documentation will win. Besides, if you put it in writing for the client, the client will (may) remember why they bought what they bought from you in the first place.