inkster4526
New Member
- 1
Folks,
I was a successful life and annuity wholesaler for 30 years. Let's talk about basics.
A VUL which was pushed in the 90's and beyond was popular because of the underlying fund returns like Wellington in Hartford Life. Fees were overlooked. The ONLY use of a VUL was funding a Sec162. Exec. Bonus Plan that was vastly overfunded the first 5 years. Goal was to withdraw income at age 65+ income tax free. Have no idea how these have worked out with the 2008-2009 market drop. Guarantees were a non issue.
Tax laws have now changed, as they usually do.
I was one of the first wholesalers in the US of EIA's. Very successful. Conducted 4 hour CE courses on the DETAILS of EIA's so agents could ethically explain a product to the public. Generated $100 million plus in annuity sales over several years.
IUL's? Have no idea of training. IUL's evolved as the market tanked to replace VUL's with the "no market losses" mantra BUT again no attention to fees or historical index returns.
I have sold retail $25million policies to high net worth clients. ALL were UL's to age 95.
All illustration's were realistic with 30 year %rate credit histories.
WL's. Great guarantees, but expensive. IUL's have sizzle but no long term steak.
Short term coverage needs = term life. Longer term needs requires permanent coverage=UL. Today if you don't add a LTC rider from a top company for the client you are doing a great injustice. I know. MY clients are all 55+.
PLEASE stop all of this flim flam with min. funding and over the top illustrations. An authentic life insurance pro is a purist. Face value is $x and premium is $x. If a client can't afford it, move on to a plan they can afford. Just don't BS a client to make a sale.
I was a successful life and annuity wholesaler for 30 years. Let's talk about basics.
A VUL which was pushed in the 90's and beyond was popular because of the underlying fund returns like Wellington in Hartford Life. Fees were overlooked. The ONLY use of a VUL was funding a Sec162. Exec. Bonus Plan that was vastly overfunded the first 5 years. Goal was to withdraw income at age 65+ income tax free. Have no idea how these have worked out with the 2008-2009 market drop. Guarantees were a non issue.
Tax laws have now changed, as they usually do.
I was one of the first wholesalers in the US of EIA's. Very successful. Conducted 4 hour CE courses on the DETAILS of EIA's so agents could ethically explain a product to the public. Generated $100 million plus in annuity sales over several years.
IUL's? Have no idea of training. IUL's evolved as the market tanked to replace VUL's with the "no market losses" mantra BUT again no attention to fees or historical index returns.
I have sold retail $25million policies to high net worth clients. ALL were UL's to age 95.
All illustration's were realistic with 30 year %rate credit histories.
WL's. Great guarantees, but expensive. IUL's have sizzle but no long term steak.
Short term coverage needs = term life. Longer term needs requires permanent coverage=UL. Today if you don't add a LTC rider from a top company for the client you are doing a great injustice. I know. MY clients are all 55+.
PLEASE stop all of this flim flam with min. funding and over the top illustrations. An authentic life insurance pro is a purist. Face value is $x and premium is $x. If a client can't afford it, move on to a plan they can afford. Just don't BS a client to make a sale.