- 11,453
IUL's? Have no idea of training. IUL's evolved as the market tanked to replace VUL's with the "no market losses" mantra BUT again no attention to fees or historical index returns.
IULs are a concept sale. Historical index returns are immaterial. Interest rates and mortality tables ARE part of it though.
The biggest issues I'm seeing right now is due to the new CSO tables which removed some of the more immediate flexibility available in IULs. Still good long-term (per the illusion - I mean illustration). If you want immediate cash values, I'd look at a whole life with PUA riders rather than an Option B IUL.
That, and these new "multipliers" which (I believe) ought to be criminal to use and are only used by people who sell by illustration - charging an asset-based fee for the chance of a higher return - completely negates the notion of "reap the upside of the market without the downside risk."
And in an effort for companies to be more competitive they are offering uncapped index segments with a spread (not to mention having a ton of other index segment options; it's insurance, it shouldn't be over-engineered). I believe that's good, but it's primarily to offset the decreasing caps.
When I first started paying attention to IUL, caps were at 14% for S&P 500 annual point-to-point. Today, they're about 9.5% or so. While that sucks for new sales... the concern is primarily on existing contracts and if they have these new index segments available for allocation.