- 15,041
While you may say that a negative interest rate is an attack upon savers, I say it is more an attack upon bankers.
If the Fed has negative interest on the fed funds rate, it isn't really an attack upon savers, although it will effect them, but on banks that refuse to lend. It does nothing for our economy for banks to park excessive amounts of money at the Fed to earn interest with zero risk. Central banks that are doing this are trying to keep the banks from just parking money, but to lend it and get it back out into the economy.
I still remember being told by a banker who had the ear of his CEO, as long as the Fed continues to offer decent interest, he would continue to park the money there versus lending it.
It seems coming out of the Great Recession, Wall Street learned nothing, and everyone else is beyond risk adverse.
If the Fed has negative interest on the fed funds rate, it isn't really an attack upon savers, although it will effect them, but on banks that refuse to lend. It does nothing for our economy for banks to park excessive amounts of money at the Fed to earn interest with zero risk. Central banks that are doing this are trying to keep the banks from just parking money, but to lend it and get it back out into the economy.
I still remember being told by a banker who had the ear of his CEO, as long as the Fed continues to offer decent interest, he would continue to park the money there versus lending it.
It seems coming out of the Great Recession, Wall Street learned nothing, and everyone else is beyond risk adverse.