- 2,908
What would happen is carriers like World, Imerica, Assurant, etc...would issue GI plans with a much higher OOP and fewer benefits and still advance commissions and pay more than carriers with more name recognition.
.
There could be some of that but there is no doubt that Obama and the feds intend to carrot and stick people into their approved plans while also pretending that they have free market choice.
So for example, yes, you could go over to the GI XYZ Plan with a higher OOP and fewer benefits and theoretically get into a more affordable plan. Then you do the math and find that if you go into one of Obama's "creditable" (health exchange approved/whatever) plans you can get the subsidy or tax credit for it and end out with more benefits and lower out of pocket for the same monthly outlay when you calculate in the subsidies. Which one you going to go with? But the government says it is not forcing you and you can still go with all those other free market alternatives if you wish. Could happen.
I think if the republicans were in power, which they of course are not, they would go for the subsidy/tax credit piece but just tell people to go out in the market and apply it where they want as long as they can demonstrate that it was spent on health insurance. Such a plan could also be implemented overnight without any bureaucracy. If something major blows up with the democrats approach I suppose the idea could gain some ground again, but so far they are on a roll. However, the economic crisis is still pending and who knows what people will be willing to bite off if it gets worse, including state bailouts. As stated, I would go with Plan B first and then look at Obama's Plan A down the road rather than versa vice. I was not elected as President though unlike Obama. I am however a natural born U.S. Citizen.
Last edited: