- 1,162
Exactly. We are all unifying against the people that think men can get pregnant. Very unifying. Also, f*ck you again.
awwww *** you too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly. We are all unifying against the people that think men can get pregnant. Very unifying. Also, f*ck you again.
I think you're missing the point, Wino. We need to throw the constitution out the window, because some people might get their little feelings hurt, or read something online that they disagree with.
That's good. We need to do whatever is possible to protect all the weaklings that might happenchance upon something they disagree with. These safe-space weaklings must be protected at all costs, no matter how many lives or freedoms are destroyed in the process.The Governor isn't even trying to hide it anymore here in the People's Republic with the new censorship bill.
That's good. We need to do whatever is possible to protect all the weaklings that might happenchance upon something they disagree with. These safe-space weaklings must be protected at all costs, no matter how many lives or freedoms are destroyed in the process.
I recently heard Kamala refer to "the collective". I wondered, "You mean, like the Borg?"For the betterment of the Party.
Resistance is futile.
There are some who even think the last election was stolen, as crazy as that sounds. Mind you, they also think the Earth is flat, the moon landings were fake and 9/11 was an inside job. They're easy to spot as they also smell like bleach and walk around with flashlights hanging out of the orifices.That's good. We need to do whatever is possible to protect all the weaklings that might happenchance upon something they disagree with. These safe-space weaklings must be protected at all costs, no matter how many lives or freedoms are destroyed in the process.
Yeah, I'm too subtle sometimes. Walz was saying misinformation and hate speech weren't covered by the first amendment. I mean, when did he rewrite it? It may be repugnant (hate speech), but it's most certainly allowed within the Constitution. And then the problem of who defines what hate speech is? Is calling someone on Twitter a 'candy ass' hate speech? It will be to someone.I think you're missing the point, Wino. We need to throw the constitution out the window, because some people might get their little feelings hurt, or read something online that they disagree with.
The Dems are putting out contracts on him. They'll do WHATEVER it takes to "win".
There's nothing showing the election is anything but a coin flip right now.Dude, we're going to win in a landslide. We don't want Trump dead. We want him in prison. My understanding from actual factual news reports is that both shooters were former MAGA.