Some days I feel old. Usually the days that end in Y.
Another MA article.
- Thread starter Cornelius
- Start date
problem #1--Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, focused her remarks on upcoding, a practice where insurance companies will assign an inaccurate billing code to a beneficiary’s sticker price, which increases the sum the government will pay insurance companies
This is why carriers were so eager a few years ago to send out the Visiting Nurse to find all the problems with the clients health. It wasn't to make them healthy, rather to make them more money.
problem #2--denial of care is a real thing-UHC MAPD uses computer programs to determine if they will approve a procedure. I filed an appeal to keep my Mom in the Hospital longer, but they still "won" when they denied her admission into rehab at a chosen facility...on their list...and instead forced her to go to a lower rated facility with lots of complaints. She was there 20 days and so was I-visiting her. She had a DR visit her once. Her strict dietary rules were totally ignored. They had only 1 day that an activities director came to the facility. There was a board with a calendar of activities-only one actually occurred. 80% of nurses were from a registry. Her room wasn't cleaned at all for 7 days. I could go on and on.
Looks like Cleveland Clinic has dropped to #14 . . . .
- 1,127
1 million+ patients lose coverage as insurers, hospitals drop Medicare Advantage
[EXTERNAL LINK] - 1 million+ patients lose coverage as insurers, hospitals drop Medicare Advantage • Ohio Capital Journal
OMG MA clients will DIE. The Med supp people warned them and WOW like Noah the flood has come. If you only used your GI and got the Supp you would be treated -- now you will be thrown to the back of treatment protocol and given nothing yes nothing you MA enrolled sucker. Take your opiods and die -- If you only had a supp you will LIVE. Soylent Green is PEOPLE--- PEOPLE!!!
The Case Against Medicare Advantage: a Talk With Dr. Ana Malinow
Dr. Ana Malinow. Earlier this year, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published an article titled – Less Care at Higher Cost: The
www.counterpunch.org
- 1,132
I love reading these MAPD hit pieces - the FUD, the misinformation..
At least you watched a good movie.
- 1,127
Medicare or Medicare Advantage? One of them doesn't give you what you pay for.
Medicare open enrollment is here. It's time for Congress to level the playing field.Medicare Advantage plans perform no better and in some aspects are worse than traditional Medicare.
Medicare's open-enrollment period is here, meaning millions of older Americans and people living with disabilities can compare plans and make changes to their healthcare coverage. If recent trends hold true, more than half of all enrollees will choose a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan - the private alternative to traditional Medicare.
What many enrollees don't understand is that their "choice" has effectively been made for them.
The U.S. government now pays MA plans at least 22% more per enrollee than it would cost to cover the same person under traditional Medicare. But more money doesn't mean enrollees get better care. MA plans perform no better and in some aspects are worse than traditional Medicare. Nor does the money appear to provide enrollees with meaningful control over their coverage decisions. Instead, MA plans bombard enrollees with a complicated array of options so overwhelming that almost 70% of people don't even try to compare what's available to them.
Most alarmingly, in spite of massive federal subsidies, MA plans are erecting more and more barriers to patient care, including arduous prior authorization requirements that can delay necessary procedures, and narrow networks that may exclude higher-quality providers - all while often failing to save enrollees money on care.
Read: Social Security and Medicare affect almost everyone - and they're barely being discussed
More: Considering Medicare Advantage during open enrollment? Watch out for this trap.
Nevertheless, the MA program continues to grow because for many enrollees, traditional Medicare - with its 20% coinsurance and lack of an out-of-pocket spending limit - isn't financially viable. For an older American living on a low or fixed income, making the choice between a zero-dollar-premium MA plan that claims to cover all the necessities, or paying upwards of $200 a month for a supplemental Medigap policy to guard against financial catastrophe - plus additional premiums for a supplemental prescription-drug plan and any dental, vision and hearing services - isn't really a choice at all.
In recent years, the Biden administration has tried to address some of MA's limitations by bringing more consumer protections, transparency and accountability to the program. While these efforts need to continue, we also need congressional action to improve the Medicare program for everyone so the choice between MA and traditional Medicare becomes a meaningful one.
Congress needs to give enrollees a real choice between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare.
If Congress instead doubles down on the further privatization of Medicare, the results could be disastrous. For example, the far-right authoritarian playbook known as Project 2025 calls for making MA the "default" for all enrollees. This would effectively push even more people into the program. If, as a result, just 50% more people enrolled in MA, the Center for American Progress estimates it would contribute toward $2 trillion in waste over the next decade while providing no meaningful health benefit to enrollees.
On the other hand, Congress could level the playing field by giving Medicare enrollees a real choice between MA and traditional Medicare. To put the full scale of the government's investment in MA into perspective: The Center for American Progress estimates the program will be overpaid by as much as $127 billion in 2024 alone, with any "savings" many MA plans achieve accruing to shareholders.
That's more than enough money to expand traditional Medicare coverage to include dental, vision, and hearing benefits and introduce an annual cap on out-of-pocket expenses - reforms that would help all Medicare beneficiaries. The money could also be used to fund home-based caregivers, a critical Medicare coverage gap.
https://www.morningstar.com/news/ma...-one-of-them-doesnt-give-you-what-you-pay-for
As Medicare beneficiaries navigate potential changes to their coverage during this open-enrollment period, the reality is that far too many enrollees won't have a meaningful choice set before them - but lawmakers do.
