- 990
I wonder which it is?
Malpractise insurance.
Irresponsibility. - mandated coverage
Illegals.
I hear the pubs, in their bill, address the malpractise limits to some degree?
What about the other 2?
When are we going to seal up the borders for real and grant the illegals who are already here and who aren't going anywhere the ability to be part of the mandate? And speaking of said mandate, why are the pubs not in favour of this?
Dean was running his ignorant socialist hole again today. Going off about how "the insurance companies win,etc." if all the bill offers is a "trigger" with no rublic option.
This just shows again how the Dems really are not trying to reform just take over. They won't mess with the trial lawyer lobby or the immigrants so let's just tear it down and take it over.
Perhaps the pubs and big business don't want controlled borders because all that cheap labour helps to keep out unions and keep labour costs down? Maybe they believe that is worth the trade off as far as it being o.k. for tax paying Americans to foot their medical bills by way of their premiums? Just asking.
Malpractise insurance.
Irresponsibility. - mandated coverage
Illegals.
I hear the pubs, in their bill, address the malpractise limits to some degree?
What about the other 2?
When are we going to seal up the borders for real and grant the illegals who are already here and who aren't going anywhere the ability to be part of the mandate? And speaking of said mandate, why are the pubs not in favour of this?
Dean was running his ignorant socialist hole again today. Going off about how "the insurance companies win,etc." if all the bill offers is a "trigger" with no rublic option.
This just shows again how the Dems really are not trying to reform just take over. They won't mess with the trial lawyer lobby or the immigrants so let's just tear it down and take it over.
Perhaps the pubs and big business don't want controlled borders because all that cheap labour helps to keep out unions and keep labour costs down? Maybe they believe that is worth the trade off as far as it being o.k. for tax paying Americans to foot their medical bills by way of their premiums? Just asking.
