Civil War? Nah!

[rousemark]

Is this the Vice Commander in Chief that said there are no troops in a War zone?

Kinda like Sleepy saying no military dead under his watch.

Some of you should be buying property in Canada so the kids have somewhere to stay.

I love the way they blame the casualties that occured during the Afghan withdrawal on Trump because "he announced the withdrawal date in advance". Biden was in office and if the withdrawal was a bad idea, he was not obligated to stick to that date. He could have set it it aside just like he did many Trump policies. Biden was in office and in charge so it is all on him.

 

[Allen Trent]

Tag says made in PA

Panama. Most beautiful country, quite possibly the best ever. Those people love me. No one knows more about the Panamanianganders than me.

 

[toolbelt]

He could have set it it aside just like he did many Trump policies.

Name 5 examples

 

[DayTimer]

Biden was in office and if the withdrawal was a bad idea, he was not obligated to stick to that date

Well, sparky, unfortunately because of the terms of Trumpty Dumbty's agreement, the US was obligated, no matter who the president was at the time.

He doesn't make the best deals, you know.

 

[MTC]

Well, sparky, unfortunately because of the terms of Trumpty Dumbty's agreement, the US was obligated, no matter who the president was at the time.

He doesn't make the best deals, you know.

You're kidding right. You realize you're on a public forum. So you're saying Biden couldn't have changed ANY terms of the agreement? Maybe I'm mistaken.

 

[WinoBlues]

Admittedly Sleepy is the weakest president since Jimmy.

And Afghanistan was 3 years ago. Today he is a National Security problem.

 

[DayTimer]

So you're saying Biden couldn't have changed ANY terms of the agreement?

His choice appeared to be withdraw per the agreement or recommit and send back a combat force. If he had decided to refuel the war he'd be catching heat from the right wing media that he couldn't end the war.

Lisa Curtis who served during Trumps administration had this to say about Trump's agreement:

“The Doha agreement was a very weak agreement, and the U.S. should have gained more concessions from the Taliban,” said Lisa Curtis, an Afghanistan expert who served during the Trump administration as the National Security Council’s senior director for South and Central Asia.

She called it “wishful thinking” to believe that the Taliban might be interested in lasting peace. The resulting agreement, she said, was heavily weighted toward the Taliban, contributed to undermining Afghan President Ashraf Ghani — he fled the country Sunday and is now in the United Arab Emirates — and facilitated the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners without a commensurate concession from the Taliban.

“They wanted U.S. forces out, and they wanted to take over the country militarily, and they believed that they could do that,” Curtis said of the Taliban. “That was just crystal clear.”

 

[DayTimer]

You're kidding right. You realize you're on a public forum. So you're saying Biden couldn't have changed ANY terms of the agreement? Maybe I'm mistaken.

And let's not forget that the whole shit show in Iraq and Afghanistan was a GOP war that Buch/Cheyney engineered to the point of lying about weapons of mass destruction and hiding the Saudi involvement in 9/11.

 

[MTC]

His choice appeared to be withdraw per the agreement or recommit and send back a combat force. If he had decided to refuel the war he'd be catching heat from the right wing media that he couldn't end the war.

Lisa Curtis who served during Trumps administration had this to say about Trump's agreement:

“The Doha agreement was a very weak agreement, and the U.S. should have gained more concessions from the Taliban,” said Lisa Curtis, an Afghanistan expert who served during the Trump administration as the National Security Council’s senior director for South and Central Asia.

She called it “wishful thinking” to believe that the Taliban might be interested in lasting peace. The resulting agreement, she said, was heavily weighted toward the Taliban, contributed to undermining Afghan President Ashraf Ghani — he fled the country Sunday and is now in the United Arab Emirates — and facilitated the release of 5,000 Taliban prisoners without a commensurate concession from the Taliban.

“They wanted U.S. forces out, and they wanted to take over the country militarily, and they believed that they could do that,” Curtis said of the Taliban. “That was just crystal clear.”

Is this the rest of your copy and paste? Same article or a different one? Same gal? He screwed up. Just own it. What if Barry originally made the deal? I'm guessing you and your ilk would be singing a different tune. Definitely TDS. Get help.

Loading…

www.cnn.com

 

[toolbelt]

Is this the rest of your copy and paste? Same article or a different one? Same gal? He screwed up. Just own it. What if Barry originally made the deal? I'm guessing you and your ilk would be singing a different tune. Definitely TDS. Get help.

Loading…

www.cnn.com

So we should have remained there, which would require sending back a full force, to win a war over ideology (remember Vietnam)? The only way to win a war over ideology is to nuke an entire country. Is that what you're suggesting?