Curt Schilling: AIG Cancelled Insurance Due To 'Social Media Profile'

Do people always wear combat gear and carry assault rifles to peaceful protests? Are zip ties a common fashion accessory? Asking for a friend.

I wouldn't say "common," but it happens quite a bit.



I've been watching people show up to "protests" with shields, helmets, clubs, bricks, explosives, bear mace, Molotov cocktails, lasers to shine in people's eyes and, yes, guns and rifles (I've yet to see an "assault rifle" at any protest) for quite awhile now.
 
But if you refuse to acknowledge that what happened was an attempted coup to overthrow our democratic process. Then you are enabling treason, therefore you are a traitor to this country and its democracy.
Ok. So, to disagree with The Narrative is treason. Thanks for helping me make my point.
 
Ok. So, to disagree with The Narrative is treason. Thanks for helping me make my point.

Do you also disagree with the "narrative" of 9/11? Were we not attacked by terrorists?

A fact is a fact. Its not narrative.

The FBI is not making a hypothesis about this. They are looking at what was said on film and in print, by the very people doing it and perpetuating it.

What people said on camera is a fact.
What people did on camera is a fact.
What people posted online is a fact.

Stating what a person said and did on the record is not a "narrative", its a fact. Its on film, its in print, it came out of their mouths. Thats not narrative.

If you refuse to accept facts about treason, you are enabling the traitors.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't say "common," but it happens quite a bit.



I've been watching people show up to "protests" with shields, helmets, clubs, bricks, explosives, bear mace, Molotov cocktails, lasers to shine in people's eyes and, yes, guns and rifles (I've yet to see an "assault rifle" at any protest) for quite awhile now.

Did you also happen to notice the wall of heavily armed cops opposing the demonstrators, as well as the semi-permanent fencing and concrete barriers? There were 10x more cops in that clip for a substantially smaller crowd, than there were in Washington. Odd that the BLM law enforcement teams were greater in number at a social justice event than were in Washington protecting the very seat of the nation's democratic values.
 
Did you also happen to notice the wall of heavily armed cops opposing the demonstrators, as well as the semi-permanent fencing and concrete barriers? There were 10x more cops in that clip for a substantially smaller crowd, than there were in Washington. Odd that the BLM law enforcement teams were greater in number at a social justice event than were in Washington protecting the very seat of the nation's democratic values.

First, no, there were not 10X more cops in that clip than there were in DC.

Second, take some time to read about security preparations in DC leading up to the 6th and get back to me.
 

This is what I'm talking about.

You claim, "the real powers behind this were right-wing pro-fascist militias," and you believe this because the planning was "in the open on all forms of social media." When asked for actual examples of this, you provide a link to an article where someone says he saw posts about militias activating, along with QAnon conspiracy theorists, etc. Nothing corroborating that these posts were made by actual militias (who aren't exactly known for planning things on public forums), that any actual militia's plans were carried out, or that militias were the "real powers" involved. No actual examples of these posts were provided.

Not only that, but in this article, the same guy says, "But there wasn't any real sort of significant action happening on the ground until Trump finished his speech." Which is false. It is documented, on video, that people were fighting police and breaking through barriers outside the capitol 20 minutes before his speech ended.
 
that people were fighting police and breaking through barriers outside the capitol 20 minutes before his speech ended.
Rudy spoke before Trump, as did that dingbat republican, both of whom suggested going to battle and kicking ass. The problem you fail to realize is that Trump is indefensible and always has been. The only benefit Trump has been is to fatten the wallets of those at the top. If his corporate tax cuts and deregulations benefitted you personally, just have the balls to say so. If his handling of the pandemic put money in your pocket because you own big pharma or medical or parcel delivery or Amazon stock, just man up.
 
This is what I'm talking about.

You claim, "the real powers behind this were right-wing pro-fascist militias," and you believe this because the planning was "in the open on all forms of social media." When asked for actual examples of this, you provide a link to an article where someone says he saw posts about militias activating, along with QAnon conspiracy theorists, etc. Nothing corroborating that these posts were made by actual militias (who aren't exactly known for planning things on public forums), that any actual militia's plans were carried out, or that militias were the "real powers" involved. No actual examples of these posts were provided.

Not only that, but in this article, the same guy says, "But there wasn't any real sort of significant action happening on the ground until Trump finished his speech." Which is false. It is documented, on video, that people were fighting police and breaking through barriers outside the capitol 20 minutes before his speech ended.

Damn...if FSU could've moved the goalposts like that back in the 90's, Bowden would have five nattys right now.

I don't know how much research you want him to do for you, but a good place to start in figurin' out who is behind this is to check out the posts on open forums of who has been arrested and what ties to what far right groups they have.

It's not that hard to find.
 
Back
Top