is it just me, or am I really seeing HC.gov giving larger subsidies if you are a smoker, whereas Sherpa does not....assuming all else equal? Nothing is matching in the small sampling I just ran.
I did a 59Y-F in 30041 making $45K.....
With HC.gov, it is cheaper to answer smoking -= YES.....with Sherpa, it is cheaper to be a non-smoker....which of course makes sense. I always assumed the subsidy had nothing to do with smoking....so something appears to be amiss. :-)
I did a 59Y-F in 30041 making $45K.....
With HC.gov, it is cheaper to answer smoking -= YES.....with Sherpa, it is cheaper to be a non-smoker....which of course makes sense. I always assumed the subsidy had nothing to do with smoking....so something appears to be amiss. :-)