Wow! I know some of you guys like to brag about writing a plan for a prospect that has the cheapest premium available, which is commendable. You like to say you're doing what's right for the prospect.
But even though Ms. Jones may save $2-$15 per month on her premium, do u really think u did anyone any justice when u know the carrier, from prior experience, takes 6 months-10 months to pay out? How can u say u are doing what's right for the prospect when u know that carrier pays out that slow?
I guess the prospect gets what they pay for.
Wouldn't it be better to write for a company that takes a long time to pay out the contestable claim, rather than a company (such as LH or SL) that makes a decision quickly, but it's always a denial?
I think it would be better to write the company that will eventually pay the claim.