AgentGeneral
Guru
- 397
Yes, I believe CHAT spat out is it's wise to consult a medicare specialist, not a specialist who specializes in soley Med supp (somarco) or U65 (Yagent).I agree just make sure it is someone who is familiar with the full portfolio of products in that space - not just their pet products.
Nothing wrong with working mostly one market but if that's it, please stop with the barking at anyone who veers from your primary market. So many variables to make it a reasonable debate. It's impossible, so for now I'll just pipe in on how ridiculous the whole argument is.
I did ONE supp this month and I had to practically twist her arm. Irritating....it's still in underwriting since Dec 5th waiting to be guaranteed issued. I am hearing from her almost daily, and shes very well might jump ship with another agent who will likely put her on an MAPD anyway.
Live and learn. Its old, this argument. I've followed it for quite a few years. I stayed away for so long from doing MAPD, simply bc I didn't think it was worth the headache bc of all I've heard. Subjectively, I didn't dig little commish in comparison to that headache--to me, probably subjectively the pay is commensurate to what we do now....that was stupid on my part for listening to the naysayers, especially when my inner circle have been now doing MAPD for a lengthy period of time with very few issues. Those same people in the inner circle sounded just like Somarco/Y just over a decade ago.
To be honest, what I worry most about now is it changing, the structure of pay, the regulations, the bs with gub, the possible terms over nothing by carriers....yes, more uncertain about those things than if Jane or John is going to have treatment denied or preauths, or any of those things. Not bc Im money hungry, but bc I've not seen notable issues in many years, all that these naysayers scream from the rooftops.
I will admit I've seen more problems with U65 but even those, if an agent is worth their salt, most get corrected. On the pre auths and denial front, I've helped correct my share and it wasn't hard, just take the time to unwind it.
Reminder--still have the PDP issues, so whoever says most agents would love to have big books of Med Supp...not in my case. Count me tf out of that. I'll lean more toward MAPD/GTL. And when supp is more suitable I'll speak up and push it. I'm still fairly new at this part of it...and so far I've had happy customers with proof on texts of how happy they are with how their GTL paid out. Yes, cancer clients. and to my happiness, referrals follow. I always SHOW BOTH with a longer presentation.
I'll always be ready to do whatever a client needs. U65, med supp, MAPD, CI, DI, LI, LTC, annuities, whatever. LETS GET IT ON! And I won't be sitting in a forum for years dumping on whatever doesn't suit me.
Ok, well I hate dental, but dammit I'll do it if I have to.