How HHS is trying to do this is claim that if a company sells PD, and MAPD they have power to make them apply those rules to all products. It may not happen, but it definitely telegraphs what HHS wants to happen!
HHS wants to med supps gaurenteed Issue
- Thread starter SamIam
- Start date
Maybe so. But like @somarco says there are plenty of supp only companies that HHC can't touch. Same goes for CMS.
Medicare bro
Super Genius
- 218
So maybe this happening would be a good thing. The big insurance companies would struggle with supps while the Mom and Pop carriers who really need our help to sell them would thrive.
Maybe so. But I'd much prefer that CMS and HHC get out of Dodge.
Don't give them any ideas Bob...
- Thread starter
- #16
InsuranceGuy29
Guru
- 812
With Trump back in, not something we'll have to worry about anymore...thankfully.
Him and his people understand logic, common sense, and how the real world actually functions.
Things are about to change DRASTICALLY for the better in the insurance world.
As much as some misguided people think this would be good and would be a benefit to seniors, it's not. Their rates would absolutely astronomically skyrocket.
Last edited:
dunno, CT & NY markets seem to be pretty robust.
they're premiums are also much higher than many other states
those states are GI always?
MSLLC
New Member
- 11
That is true. However, the proposed rule states that if the carrier receives any government subsidy (MA, PDP, ACA), all of the carrier's products are subject to non-discrimination. Leverage. I am sure there is a way to spin off a MedSupp only division, but it does appear that life or prop/casualty carriers would be the only one exempt
