IUL for Children

Silly Question Im sure - but Why would a healthy 12 year old want an Indexed Universal Life Insurance policy?
2 possibilities in my mind, but with the caveat that parents better be fully protected themselves, have their emergency fund & saving tons for their own retirement in 401k/Roth/their own IUL/College 529

If all of the above is true, I find 2 scenarios where it might work. $250k face example, but can be lower face amounts depending on carrier offerings:

1. Low cost no lapse guarantee IUL with guaranteed insurability rider to guarantee their insurability. Basically a no lapse UL or IUL is forever term insruance. The GIR rider many times allows the child to increase their face amount every 3-5 years from the time they are 25 to 45 even if uninsurable. IE: could buy $250k of coverage for less than $50 per month & guaranteed to age 120.


2. If parents have the resources & high income/high net worth, they can buy an Accumulation focused IUL with the lowest minimum face amount & the maximize overfunding every year to keep it below the IRS MEC rules. That policy could eventually have hundreds of thousands of dollars of cash value, if not millions to be there if needed for home purchase, supplement retirement, etc. IE: $250k face amount will legally fit $7,000 per year into it. Projects to have $3-4M at projected crediting & current costs of insurance. 1739386027063.png
 
Last edited:
Imo, WL works much better for children.

That ever increasing COI on IUL can really impact a kids policy because its such a long time horizon.

You also get into max DB issues with IUL on kids. Most carriers limit kids to 50% of a parents DB. Normally, IUL has a higher DB than WL does. That can create issues with getting the DB approved if its higher than 50% of parents DB.

You can easily solve that issue by using WL. Especially pivoting to a 10pay or 15pay or 20pay WL.
 
I just don't jump into the UL/IUL vs. WL discussion any longer, other than to say one thing -- no matter how you fund any UL-chassis product, fund it to the max!!! -- you are still shifting risk back to the insured/owner.
 
2 possibilities in my mind, but with the caveat that parents better be fully protected themselves, have their emergency fund & saving tons for their own retirement in 401k/Roth/their own IUL/College 529

If all of the above is true, I find 2 scenarios where it might work. $250k face example, but can be lower face amounts depending on carrier offerings:

1. Low cost no lapse guarantee IUL with guaranteed insurability rider to guarantee their insurability. Basically a no lapse UL or IUL is forever term insruance. The GIR rider many times allows the child to increase their face amount every 3-5 years from the time they are 25 to 45 even if uninsurable. IE: could buy $250k of coverage for less than $50 per month & guaranteed to age 120.


2. If parents have the resources & high income/high net worth, they can buy an Accumulation focused IUL with the lowest minimum face amount & the maximize overfunding every year to keep it below the IRS MEC rules. That policy could eventually have hundreds of thousands of dollars of cash value, if not millions to be there if needed for home purchase, supplement retirement, etc. IE: $250k face amount will legally fit $7,000 per year into it. Projects to have $3-4M at projected crediting & current costs of insurance. View attachment 16871
THIS! sjm
 
I just don't jump into the UL/IUL vs. WL discussion any longer, other than to say one thing -- no matter how you fund any UL-chassis product, fund it to the max!!! -- you are still shifting risk back to the insured/owner.
There are extended no lapse guarantee options on some IULs, which would make overfunding redundant though. sjm
 
Low cost no lapse guarantee IUL with guaranteed insurability rider to guarantee their insurability. Basically a no lapse UL or IUL is forever term insruance. The GIR rider many times allows the child to increase their face amount every 3-5 years from the time they are 25 to 45
Just Rolls right off the tongue. Might be a great way to get someone on the airline seat right next to you to engage in a long conversation!
 
Just Rolls right off the tongue. Might be a great way to get someone on the airline seat right next to you to engage in a long conversation!
Lol, you think I am a commoner. I lean left & promote climate change, so I fly private jet when I travel to avoid taking to humans
 
Back
Top