- 14,808
All I know is this:
Some carriers have excuses while others seem to sail along without issues. I can point to health carriers in my state. Some are just fine...always. Others have constant excuses for everything - constant product changes and rate increases.
I don't know LTC. But I do see the same patter of certain carriers seeminly doing fine while John Hancock "MUST" impose a 90% rate increase in Illinois and "MUST" impose a 40% increase in MD.
So the question is not why Hancock needs to file their huge increase, it's why certain other carriers don't. Question - are there other LTC carriers who are not filing a 90% increase in IL? If not, why.
I don't believe savvy agents should simply gobble up company-generated press releases and take it as "oh, ok then."
Some carriers have excuses while others seem to sail along without issues. I can point to health carriers in my state. Some are just fine...always. Others have constant excuses for everything - constant product changes and rate increases.
I don't know LTC. But I do see the same patter of certain carriers seeminly doing fine while John Hancock "MUST" impose a 90% rate increase in Illinois and "MUST" impose a 40% increase in MD.
So the question is not why Hancock needs to file their huge increase, it's why certain other carriers don't. Question - are there other LTC carriers who are not filing a 90% increase in IL? If not, why.
I don't believe savvy agents should simply gobble up company-generated press releases and take it as "oh, ok then."
Last edited: