I'm not so sure about that. Medicare eligibility means no subsidy (APTC) for an ACA-compliant individual plan. A Plan A supplement covers 100% except for the deductible for Parts A and B, the skilled nursing copayment after 20 days, and Part B excess. Given the monthly premium of an ACA-compliant individual plan without a subsidy, it would seem that a Plan A med supp (at $300+ monthly) would be a much better alternative to an individual ACA-compliant plan.
I'm going to have to do a spreadsheet on the costs, but if its close, I am guessing she will stay.
And over 65 means no subsidy. Not Medicare eligible. Based on the above link, I'm not sure she can't get a subsidy and/or remain on an ACA plan
----------
I'm going to have to do a spreadsheet on the costs, but if its close, I am guessing she will stay.
And over 65 means no subsidy. Not Medicare eligible. Based on the above link, I'm not sure she can't get a subsidy and/or remain on an ACA plan
For the next person who runs in to this.
1. If you are on a metallic plan prior to the 25th month of disability (at which time you become Medicare eligible) you may use your metallic plan for your supplement. You are not subsidy eligible.
2. You are "allowed" to decline Part B, but you will be subject to the late enrollment penalty when you enroll in B. Metallic coverage is not considered creditable coverage for purposes of the Part B enrollment period
3. Medicare is primary over metallic plans