Actually, it's not just one carrier. Since this thread started, I have learned that some carriers are using this interpretation of the 90 day grace period, and other carriers are not. From what I understand, the way the 90 day grace period is worded in the actual regulations is the problem.
This should only apply for on-exchange subsidized plans, since they are the only ones given the 90 day grace period in the first place. But who knows. I had one agent tell me that they are experiencing it for both on & off exchange plans!
I am just telling my subsidized clients that I recommend that they pay every premium in full, and that the premium must reach the insurance company before the due date. However, at the very worst, at least once every 3 months they must pay the balance IN FULL, and that payment must reach the insurance company BEFORE the actual due date.
This should only apply for on-exchange subsidized plans, since they are the only ones given the 90 day grace period in the first place. But who knows. I had one agent tell me that they are experiencing it for both on & off exchange plans!
I am just telling my subsidized clients that I recommend that they pay every premium in full, and that the premium must reach the insurance company before the due date. However, at the very worst, at least once every 3 months they must pay the balance IN FULL, and that payment must reach the insurance company BEFORE the actual due date.