No Lapse UL to Age 100?

So buy it to 105 or 110 or longer.

Even if it was only 100...its still better than to just 85 or 88 like when moist term products run out.
 
Can't understand why someone would want one. The following article underlines a big reason why I think buying such a product is a big gamble:

U.S. Median Age Hits All-Time High of 38; Record 86,248 Are 100 or Older
326,000,000 total population
- 86,000 100+ yr olds
---------------------


2/3 of the 100+ yr olds are female. Probably widowed a couple of times. If married the husband is most likely 105 years old plus. What you guess their insurance need is?
 
That is why I ask for an opinion 0n the risk / amount of insurance you felt those 100 yr olds would need. At age 100 plus, with a few exceptions, I would guess these widows would not have large insurance needs. IMohsoHO.

Now, I do not disagree with what I think you are advocating. Permanent permanent life insurance.

Another question on those 100 + year olds. Born 1918 or earlier. Let's assume they bought their Permanent (to age 100)Life between ages 35 - 55. Outside of Participating Whole Life, what were the permanent life insurance options? Term would have mostly been ART.
 
Back
Top