Got an update from Cigna (along with everyone else) on the "no surprise" MLR ruling by HHS Shebullshits. One thing at the bottom of the Cigna memo caught my eye.
This is very intriguing.
A fellow agent sent me the Cigna email (which I already had but had not opened) and wanted my feedback on the relaxed rules for 2011 on mini-med plans. However, below that was the issue about non-US carriers.
This prompted my reply.
I also copied a retired large case underwriter who would be very familiar with the history of stop loss in the US as well as informed on the inner workings of regulation.
Unfortunately my contacts in the reinsurance intermediary market are too far in the past to really do anything. At one time I could have had one or more carriers signing on to this concept in 6 months. Not sure anyone wants to wade in to this mess or not but it sure would be interesting if someone like Fortis decided to re-enter the market with a fully insured product.
Non-US insurance companies are exempt from MLR reporting.
This is very intriguing.
A fellow agent sent me the Cigna email (which I already had but had not opened) and wanted my feedback on the relaxed rules for 2011 on mini-med plans. However, below that was the issue about non-US carriers.
This prompted my reply.
Go back 20+ years or so when self funded plans with stop loss insurance was becoming popular in groups less than 1000 lives. Because US based health insurance carriers were prohibited from offering such plans (stop loss) foreign companies, most notably Lloyds, were major players along with Swiss Re, NRG (Netherlands Reinsurance Group), Sun Life, Manu Life and a few others. Even saw Tokio Fire and Marine on some risks.
P&C companies quickly figured out the ban was on US health insurance companies so carriers like Safeco, Travelers and some minor players got in the game.
This makes me wonder if this opens the door for foreign companies to get in the game and spoil the market? They can apparently skate on the MLR issue but the plans themselves would have to comply with other issues (mandated benefits) or else the insured is subject to a fine.
I also copied a retired large case underwriter who would be very familiar with the history of stop loss in the US as well as informed on the inner workings of regulation.
Unfortunately my contacts in the reinsurance intermediary market are too far in the past to really do anything. At one time I could have had one or more carriers signing on to this concept in 6 months. Not sure anyone wants to wade in to this mess or not but it sure would be interesting if someone like Fortis decided to re-enter the market with a fully insured product.