I know they're basically the same company. My question is are they the same to the point that their GUL products are the same and would quote at identical premiums?
Also, while we're on the subject of NA, I had someone tell me their underwriting is a little tight; they can't recall seeing anyone over 70 come back better than standard. Has that been your experience?
Also, while we're on the subject of NA, I had someone tell me their underwriting is a little tight; they can't recall seeing anyone over 70 come back better than standard. Has that been your experience?