- 17,063
I think it's just the caliber of agents that are attracted to free leads and low commissions is just not really people who believe in themselves. Usually not hard workers.. So what does that gave to do with making 70% and netting $14 k ? Writing junk business they'd fail wether they got free leads or not ? They were bad agents throwing spaghetti against the wall writing anyone who could fog a mirror . There demise would have happened quicker paying $800 plus a week for leads . Of course anyone writing $20k a month of good persistent business is much better buying their own leads and making 120%.
There are exceptions though. I've had a few that started on our regular deal but weren't quite cash flowing their first year where I put them on low comp and low lead cost to get them stable. And those were successful and got back to full commissions within 6-months.
But the difference was, I hand picked them. I could see potential and that this could give them a breather. And a BIG difference was the leads I was giving them were brand new direct mail just like all of our agents run. Not watered down recycled leads that take so many of those guys out.
if an agent gives up commission to get free or cheap leads, and then the leads are a watered down version of (anything other than NEW direct mail leads), then why did he give up the comp? He should just take full commissions and buy his own recycled leads cheap.