I'm a believer in DI, I just feel this is bad positioning, leaving a huge exposure to the business owner.
This is what I have been trying to say, but you did a better job.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a believer in DI, I just feel this is bad positioning, leaving a huge exposure to the business owner.
There are Major difference between the two insurances and with IDI, unless there are exceptions for Pre-x conditions, have no limits, as WC does, as well as rate and other guarantees!
I still don't see how a DI policy covers the same risk. Let's take a scenerio, one we hope doesn't happen...
A worker leans over a railing, falls, breaks his back. Permanently paralyzed.
What does DI cover? A portion of his income for the period of the insurance.
What does workers comp cover? The medical bills, the rehab bills, income, etc.
The DI policy will fall far short, at least the way I see it. Am I wrong?
Yes, minor stuff, no big deal, perhaps. Broken leg.... workers comp would have benefits, not out long enough for DI to kick in. Cut a finger off? Same thing, workers comp would have benefits, not out long enough for DI. Have a back injury, but not catastrophic, out 6 months? Okay, not much workers comp needed, DI might work.
Give me an example where a work injury has better benefits under DI than under workers comp.
I'm a believer in DI, I just feel this is bad positioning, leaving a huge exposure to the business owner.
Dan