Greg, Settlers has nothing to do with whether or not you knew that SL did not have a rating. The importance of the rating has nothing to do with your posting a link to something you knew not to be true. You have certainly known it more recently than 10 years ago because you have posted this same argument as to why SL not haven't a rating is not important since then. I have always tried to give you the benefit of a doubt but your post about SL have an A+ Best rating was downright deceptive designed to fool those that might not know any better.I knew that about 10 years ago. Haven't heard about it since. As long as the carrier meets each states' Dept. of Insurance minimums, financials, etc, that's all that matters. Remember when Settler's was rated A- one day and the next day was in receivership? That tells you how important, accurate, and reliable good ole A Best is, doesn't it.
So when the subject came up the other evening I did a quick Google search and posted what Google said.