- 185
Over 40 years in the health insurance industry, almost half of that on the carrier side, I never heard them refer to themselves as health care companies. The lame stream media uses that term, as well as the misnomer "healthcare", on a regular basis.
How many companies go looking for ways to lose money? Do you run your business in such a way as to target deadbeats who will cost you more money than you make? Will you accept clients pro bono at the exclusion of one where you expect to make a profit?
BTW, profit is not a 4 letter word, except among the left . . .
Health insurance is often marketed as healthcare rather than the financial tool it is. If people realized by and large their insurance was just that, insurance, there would be a universal healthcare system in America already. At least in my opinion.
Like you I focus on Medicare because you're right it's straight forward healthcare coverage that mimics insurance. Easy to explain with lots of patient protection. Private insurance can be a nightmare when someone actually gets sick with denial of claims and network issues. Then as the agent you have to walk them through appeals and grievances. I too have seen both sides.
My issue with calling sick people losers is that it's disrespectful and not compassionate. Let me say what I tell everyone, an insurance company is a financial company designed to make a profit. It is what it is.
I'm not committed to some economic ideology that I think private insurance is better than universal coverage no matter what though. As a matter of fact I think a blend of private competition and universal coverage is the best way to go. But let us all not be fooled, carriers have their best interest in mind, not subscribers.
----------
How is that different than any other segment of insurance industry? Companies engage in behavior to reduce claims and attract more desirable business.
Right. My point is most people don't understand their health insurance is actually a financial tool. They view it as access to healthcare.