- Thread starter
- #11
- 307
The home health agencies are the worst for us around here. They bash MA plans to their clients non stop and tell their clients that they can't come to their house anymore if they sign up on an Advantage plan (which is completely untrue).
It is usually a good indicator of a home health agency that is making unneccessary visits to patients just to bill medicare. They know that an MA company is going to be a little more strict on unneccessary visits.
I've never filed a complaint, but I should. Who would you complain to about a private home health agency?
We have had similar problems with the Home Health Agencies.
It appears they are under the jurisdiction of the State Board of Health in OK. This is where I would start:
Oklahoma State Department of Health - OSDH Home
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
So no more Tenn Care and she can't afford the MA co-pays....So how will she afford the medicare cost...So now she only has original Medicare....Think she will like the first $155 or part b costs?
I am not a fan of MA plans mainly due to the insane marketing rules but I agree they can be appropriate for some people...And this person sounds like a good fit, income just above medicaid. I would not worry too much about this client my bet is she ends up with a medical condition her assets go south and back to Tenn Care she goes. I wouldn't work too hard for someone that can't afford $13 a month for her insurance coverage I've found them to be the type to spend a lot of time on due to their income levels but not get a lot back in return...
VaDwayne, I bet his problem is a lot of people call themselves good christian people only to lower peoples hesitation factors....I know personally when someone tells me they are a good christian I cover my wallet...If your a good christian you don't need to be telling people that....however In this case what does the Pharmacist have to gain? My bet is he has had a lot of people on MAPD plans with inferior formularies which is why he developed his belief that anything with advantage in it was bad because that is all he would deal with...
Joe sorry for your son, tell him to move on when this client realizes she wants back on MA she will be outside her enrollment period and will have to wait. Tell him he can't fix stupid and to move on she might come back or she might not.
By filing a complaint against him with his governing board, they will probably choose not to get involved. But, my thought is by hassling him with having to deal with it, he may think twice before he starts bashing without knowing anything he is talking about.
The lady has been off Tenn-Care 4 months, and is watching bills pile up that she cannot pay. This is why she came to us in a frantic fit. We are not too concerned about keeping her as a client, but want to try to make the pharmacist think twice before giving wrong advice. This is the same pharmacist that told me there was no difference in any of the Part-D plans, just some companies charge more than others. He really thought this. I have known him 35 years and he has had a lot of ethical issues come up. Once losing his license for either one or two years. I do not know all the details, but he has lived on the edge quite a few times.
We still have her as a client in a Part-D only plan, so we may not be through with her.
As long as she receives assistance, she is not bound to the election periods. She has a permanent SEP (can change, add or subtract plans anytime). Two weeks ago I had to intervene when she gets on the phone and enrolls in a MAPD plan that would not cover 2 of her drugs. She then comes to us crying about how she had messed up.
As so many on here have said: "Fixing stupid is impossible". In this situation, the statement also applies to the pharmacist.
Last edited: