- 17,077
Per Scott, that debt agreement is not binding anyway. I would guess same as an agreement to release.
It's a written agreement on the release. The IMOs are agreeing to it. And most companies accept the release with that condition on it. A few don't. But when debt rolls up the companies don't really remember about it. It's up to the IMOs to sort it out.
We learned when we release agents to always get the actual IMO or someone financially stable to accept the debt on the release. Like if Joe Schmoo builder agent is 3-layers down from Matt (or even 1-layer down for that matter) I'm going to require that Matt or Brad sign. There can be a lot of potential money lost through debts and I need to know that someone stable and going to still be in the business six months from now is responsible for it
Guys moving around are huge debt risks. There are sometimes guys moving for right reasons but way toooften they are moving because they realize they are failing out and the chargebacks are catching up with them. When agents want to move some companies away but leave some behind they are usually wanting to leave the ones behind that have debt and they don't plan to pay it back.
There are definitely a lot of bad IMOs and recruiters in this biz but there are a huge number of bad agents too. Both sides need to know what to look for.
When we transfer an agent in from another agency we rarely will sign a release accepting his current companies. Usually they just sold Trans, Americo, AmAm, RNA, etc. anyway. And they are usually (not always) coming from a shady agency that is going to try to flip their business on them and cause them chargebacks. We just set them up with all new companies and have them cancel the old ones. In six months if they want any of the old ones again we can set them right back with those. But no point on accepting debt responsibility on companies that aren't necessary when there are so many great companies to sell these days.