Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read and read and read many books over these three products and somehow cannot understand them. The only I see them is that one is fit for lower class, lower to middle class and upper middle class...
Don't hate me, I'm so new to this and want to understand everything. Even my MGA cannot tell me the difference between them, because all he sell in his career is simplified whole life, or whole life, term and a few universal life.
Which is why I don't invest into Gold, although I consider it more solid an investment than the paper, bonds, and funds of today.
I recommend silver, it is finite, and we are using more and more per year in technology alone. It is easily portable, tradeable, and has a much higher potential for increase and stability in price than gold. Silver will outperform gold in the long run due to its easiness of using it to back a majority of currencies as well.
If you want your clients to understand what they are buying, then the simplest and best strategy is keep investments separate from life insurance. That means most of the time selling term life. If your client needs whole life insurance, then sell no lapse UL with a guaranteed premium. That is the lowest cost form of whole life.
Stress to you client that if they should miss paying premiums for any of the above mentioned products, they lose their insurance.
Even term has a grace period and a reinstatement period. As much as you like these products, I'm surprised you would give someone incorrect information.
In fairness to Robert, I believe what he meant was that GUL is "like" WL in that it is permanent and level.
In fairness to Robert, I believe what he meant was that GUL is "like" WL in that it is permanent and level.
Once again, whole life is insurance in force for the whole of your life. Fully guaranteed, no lapse UL to age 121 meeting that criteria in spades.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If you want to make a point, do it without appearing to be my explainer. If that is what I meant, I would have said that.
Once again, whole life is insurance in force for the whole of your life. Fully guaranteed, no lapse UL to age 121 meeting that criteria in spades.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If you want to make a point, do it without appearing to be my explainer. If that is what I meant, I would have said that.
Once again, whole life is insurance in force for the whole of your life. Fully guaranteed, no lapse UL to age 121 meeting that criteria in spades.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
If you want to make a point, do it without appearing to be my explainer. If that is what I meant, I would have said that.
You just did above. So what is your problem? Now who is being, in your words, an "arrogant prick?"
Robert, I was giving you a compliment. I meant no disrespect. You should work on not being an a$ ALL the time. Some of the time is fine... but being an a$ ALL of the time is very hard to do. I'm one of the few people who excel at it, and you are hardly in my league.
It's no wonder so many people disagree with you... in this one and in other life threads. Someone tries to come to your assistance and you kick them in balls. I hope you treat your customers better.
Robert, if you want to refer to coverage that lasts as long as an insured lives, call it 'permanent insurance'. To say otherwise is misleading.