jakecreeves
New Member
- 3
I'd rather pay $400 for my leads and get paid 125% than "only" pay $300 for the same leads and get paid 80% ...
$3000 AP * 125% = $3750 commission *75% advance = $2812.50 Gross- $400 lead cost = $2412.50 net/week
$3000 AP * 80% = $2400 commission * 75% advance = $1800 gross - $300 lead cost = $1500net/week
Even a 100% contract
$3000 AP = $3000 commission * 75% advance = $2250 gross - $400 lead cost = $1850net/week
So compared to an 100% contract, the $15 lead/80% agent is actually paying $32.50/Facebook lead.
Compared to the 125% contract an experienced agent can get, those FB leads are costing the 80% agent ... $62.63/lead
Either join an IMO that starts you at 100% or more with a path to 110-125%, or go sell cars, imo. I would stop my contracting in its tracks right now, and I'd speak with one of the forum IMO's and get started right from jump street. Reach out to @SPUR CITY or @Jose Arteaga or @HoosierLife or @Rearden or @Agentguy5 ... Just do it!
No the math is spot on obviously, me personally I'd rather jump in the lake a learn to swim while I'm out there. No one should be paying for leads on those contracts. Especially not FB, we're talking $4 per for generation.
On 80% if you're getting fat stacks of leads and FB to fill in, hands on training program (where you're brand new to the industry) that's far better than what I've seen a lot of "Top" MGAs offer.