Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would not sell Conseco to save my life.
If 78% of all cancers are diagnosed in people 55 years of age and older, how can you justify premuim going for that if they don't have the Life and DI coverage they need?
Tony
Would you mind explaining why using anecdotal evidence?
I'm just curious...
If 78% of all cancers are diagnosed in people 55 years of age and older, how can you justify premuim going for that if they don't have the Life and DI coverage they need?
Tony
Searched but didn't find it.. What was the thread title?If you search for Conseco on here, I once wrote a very long story about them and why I hate them.
Using the same reasoning, 95% of deaths occur after age 55, how do you justify taking premium for a life insurance policy on younger people. They might as well wait until 55 to buy it.Don't think any agent is going to agree with that statement.
Take a look at a comparison of actual premiums with AGLA for a Platinum Plus cancer plan. assuming premiums paid to age 65.
Age 25 Premium $14.57 per month x 12 x 40 = $6,003.60
Age 50 Premium $41.07 per month x 12 x 15 = $7,392.60
The 25 year old has paid $399.00 less but has had the coverage for 40 years longer. Plus if the 25 year old had taken advantage of the screening benefit from age 35 to 50 (assume they both use the benefit from 50 to 65) that would be an additional $1.125.00 savings for a total savings of $1,524.00. The premium is not enough that it should be painful and force the 25 year old to do without other coverages and yet if they are in that 22% of cancer patients under 55, they will receive thousands of dollars that will be very much needed. ( speaking from experience)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Searched but didn't find it.. What was the thread title?
The 25 year old pays less but has higher opportunity costs due to the time value of money.