How Do You Guys Just Knock on Doors???

[FONT=&quot]In,TPAAgent's original sentence it said "sent you out a card like this one" then shows them one[/FONT]...

Correct. That's the part which I object. She was NOT sent out a card like this one. Saying that she MAY have a received a card like this one would be fine. But he knows she was not mailed a card yet still said something he knew to be wrong. That's the unethical part.

And I'm not going to back out on this one as you suggest. I not only believe I'm right, I am right.

Rick
 
Correct. That's the part which I object. She was NOT sent out a card like this one. Saying that she MAY have a received a card like this one would be fine. But he knows she was not mailed a card yet still said something he knew to be wrong. That's the unethical part.

And I'm not going to back out on this one as you suggest. I not only believe I'm right, I am right.

Rick

Dude, you JUST said you wanted to put it to bed, then "lied" and when you said
"Basically, you all are agreeing with me."
That's not true, Rick

You said
"Had TPA used the "similar to this" line, I wouldn't have even responded to this thread."



Similar and like ARE THE SAME WORD, RICK!

At least stay with the same position:

"similar to this" you claim you're ok with and you wouldn't have said a peep your quote, right?

Are you lying to yourself? because "like this" is the SAME phrase when school starts back we can ask a 3rd grade teacher, just to be sure.

You're all over the place here, please STOP this insane quest to have to be right...when your contradicting yourself in own words, in your own post.

For the love of God, STOP...you're embarrassing yourself...we all know, you speak English as a 1st language and you understand like and similar are kinda' the same word.
 
Last edited:
For the love of God, STOP...you're embarrassing yourself...we all know, you speak English as a 1st language and you understand like and similar are kinda' the same word.

First, there is no god.

Second, it's the "you were sent" part that bothers me. Changing it to "you may have been sent" is completely different.

If you still don't understand what I'm saying, call me and I'll explain.

Rick
 
First, there is no god.

Second, it's the "you were sent" part that bothers me. Changing it to "you may have been sent" is completely different.

If you still don't understand what I'm saying, call me and I'll explain.

Rick

Finally something we can agree on today.

I used the "love of God" thing as a bit of hyperbole for effect, only for effect.

And I've got no problem giving you a call later (if your cell's still the same).

Like I said earlier, Rick...anybody can change the scenario...when they want to win BAD enough.

You, now change the sentence you had an issue with, dude 5 minutes ago it was
"Had TPA used the "similar to this" line, I wouldn't have even responded to this thread."

Your post, your quote were you confused?

Now you say your problem is different

"it's the "you were sent" part that bothers me"

Like, i said you're all over the place, read what you say, my friend.

I can't keep jumping through different rooms till you find one you like.

Did you change those "lies" on your website yet?

Bob Bever must have really done a job on your outlook of people, everybody is unethical except you like I said when schools open after the break we can double-check similar and like..oh' I'm sorry you've changed to a new position Mr Candidate...:idea:

Maybe you should throw your hat in the ring, as a VP candidate, you got the misremember thing down as good as Roger Clemens or any politician.:twitchy:

 
Yeah, you're right. All along I've been saying something different.

My first posts were to complain that he said that he would say that "you were sent." I've been consistent and you are correct, I did not completely post my objection the last time.

You want the last word, fine. I've read most of your posts in the past few weeks so I already know all I need to know about you.

Rick
 
Yeah, you're right. All along I've been saying something different.

My first posts were to complain that he said that he would say that "you were sent." I've been consistent and you are correct, I did not completely post my objection the last time.

You want the last word, fine. I've read most of your posts in the past few weeks so I already know all I need to know about you.

Rick

Classy, Rick
When you're dead wrong swing and swing low, no problem, bro.
"All along I've been saying something different."

Yet I won't respond in as negative a tone as many people on this forum are accustomed to doing.
I don't need the last word but you're correct I don't care for people misrepresenting my words and saying something silly at the end of a post...just to look good.

Stay on point and you wouldn't have an issue, your upset because you couldn't support your statement....I've admitted to making error in life seems you have an issue doing the same,

You can reference my past post all you like, instead of simply disagreeing you had to "go for the knees" and call me a "used car salesmen" and imply I'm unethical but I swing 'high" and square when I have a dispute or a difference of opinion. I still show respect to the person, I'm speaking to unless they change the tone.

See didn't need to call you a sophomoric name, just honorable words and sticking to the facts it easy, if one tries.

Btw thanks for being a fan my post....No charge.
 
Last edited:
Gemini,
Seriously? You sound like a little kid trying to win an argument. We all know what Rick meant. You are just being annoying about it.

Senior speak for yourself not for "we all"
Did Rick, jump in your comment and accuse "you" of being a "used car salesmen"?
Did he imply that you were unethical and would try to trick an old lady, who just lost her husband into buying a policy?
(Did you read, that part, pal) (I'm the annoying kid, he didn't have to direct a comment to me)
Then have to back off on the charge cause, he was wrong?

Senior, I'm cool being the little kid who's still innocent enough to say "no that's not what I said" get it RIGHT.

Rick disagreed with a point, that's fine but don't distort my words then personally attack character...You better be right and he wrote he position twice, then changed it so I'm impressed that you can read his mind with all the jumping around and all.

You have a point, I will not be lied upon and misquoted...we all can make a misstatement the difference is I can say "my bad" when I'm wrong but others here sometimes seem to feel their s**t don't stink when it comes to admitting to their errors.

You 100% correct I'm irked with people who, just won't quit when they jump to wrong conclusions, then won't man up about it.

**Hell that wasn't even my thread, I was just agreeing with some other poster and he jumped in on me but you're right I swing till the bell when somebody hits below the belt.


btw I'm enjoying my vacation, only have a few days left with you guys before I go back to work f/t (well f/t for me anyway) I'll miss this daily banter.:err:
 
Last edited:
I would think that the vast majority of salesmen hate cold calling. It is a pain in the ass expecialy in Michigan. If I was broke and had to make some money I would cold call just enough to get some money so I could buy some telemarketed leads.
 
Did Rick, jump in your comment and accuse "you" of being a "used car salesmen"?
Did he imply that you were unethical and would try to trick an old lady, who just lost her husband into buying a policy?

You are correct to your point #1. I should have put a smilie after it.

However, I did not even imply that you would "Paper Moon" a widow. I just used that an example.

It's not always about you. My initial response was not directed toward you but if the shoe fits...

You knew damn well what I objected to but you decided to keep on and on. Maybe I hurt your feelings and you feel necessary to jump on my ass.

We have a difference of opinion about what is ethical. Telling a client that something was mailed to them when it wasn't is a lie and therefore unethical.

I've spelled it out about 10 times for you. If you refuse to understand or simply want to attack me, have at it. But at least have the nads to post who you are instead of hiding behind your forum name.

Rick
 
Back
Top