Was discussing Mag's post with my friend thinking about contracting options, etc. and I failed to remember one HUGE issue with Equita. I would first like to apologize for missing this in my initial post in which I said they "fall short in a couple of areas."
It's not quite as simple as that. They do fall short in to me what is the biggest of issues which is also a HOT topic on this board...releases and/or lack there of. Being contracted with Equita means that you are married to Americo via Equita. You may have one way out and that would be to pay in cash for all of the money you were advanced and then you might get a release. That in and of itself is not that far from the norm on a product with the amount of fallout as a MP product however the next fact blew my mind when I saw it happen.
Equita has the ability to and will exercise at their discretion the option of blocking and/or reversing contracting with carriers that the agent did not have prior to contracting with Equita. This is due to what I would call side agreements between IMO's to expressly not allow the contracting of their agents and/or to reverse such contacts if they are then found out.
I know some will say that can't happen. I can only say yes they can, have and will.
Again, not meant to be a bash of any type, just the facts.
It's not quite as simple as that. They do fall short in to me what is the biggest of issues which is also a HOT topic on this board...releases and/or lack there of. Being contracted with Equita means that you are married to Americo via Equita. You may have one way out and that would be to pay in cash for all of the money you were advanced and then you might get a release. That in and of itself is not that far from the norm on a product with the amount of fallout as a MP product however the next fact blew my mind when I saw it happen.
Equita has the ability to and will exercise at their discretion the option of blocking and/or reversing contracting with carriers that the agent did not have prior to contracting with Equita. This is due to what I would call side agreements between IMO's to expressly not allow the contracting of their agents and/or to reverse such contacts if they are then found out.
I know some will say that can't happen. I can only say yes they can, have and will.
Again, not meant to be a bash of any type, just the facts.