Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi WIN,Was discussing Mag's post with my friend thinking about contracting options, etc. and I failed to remember one HUGE issue with Equita. I would first like to apologize for missing this in my initial post in which I said they "fall short in a couple of areas."
It's not quite as simple as that. They do fall short in to me what is the biggest of issues which is also a HOT topic on this board...releases and/or lack there of. Being contracted with Equita means that you are married to Americo via Equita. You may have one way out and that would be to pay in cash for all of the money you were advanced and then you might get a release. That in and of itself is not that far from the norm on a product with the amount of fallout as a MP product however the next fact blew my mind when I saw it happen.
Equita has the ability to and will exercise at their discretion the option of blocking and/or reversing contracting with carriers that the agent did not have prior to contracting with Equita. This is due to what I would call side agreements between IMO's to expressly not allow the contracting of their agents and/or to reverse such contacts if they are then found out.
I know some will say that can't happen. I can only say yes they can, have and will.
Again, not meant to be a bash of any type, just the facts.
Note... DID NOT HAVE means you picked up this contract from Equita.Was discussing Mag's post with my friend thinking about contracting options, etc. and I failed to remember one HUGE issue with Equita. I would first like to apologize for missing this in my initial post in which I said they "fall short in a couple of areas."
It's not quite as simple as that. They do fall short in to me what is the biggest of issues which is also a HOT topic on this board...releases and/or lack there of. Being contracted with Equita means that you are married to Americo via Equita. You may have one way out and that would be to pay in cash for all of the money you were advanced and then you might get a release. That in and of itself is not that far from the norm on a product with the amount of fallout as a MP product however the next fact blew my mind when I saw it happen.
Equita has the ability to and will exercise at their discretion the option of blocking and/or reversing contracting with carriers that the agent did not have prior to contracting with Equita. This is due to what I would call side agreements between IMO's to expressly not allow the contracting of their agents and/or to reverse such contacts if they are then found out.
I know some will say that can't happen. I can only say yes they can, have and will.
Again, not meant to be a bash of any type, just the facts.
I have been ensured verbally by Equita that they would have no problem with a release should I ask for one, but words come easy. Trust, but verify... (RR)
Exactly...last time I checked a verbal release and $1.99 does still get you a cup of coffee!
maybe they are going to be the new naa... naa won an injunction against them yesterday and it looks like they are both shady but NAA is way worse. You all need to read the affidavit of Mr. Montebon. I will post in 6 more posts when they will let me. I forgot my stupid login and had to create a new account...
there is the link for everyone... public info. Please share it with whomever you think will be interested.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
here is your new marketing director for Equita... look familiar? Have fun!
The legal hassle appears to be NAA fighting EMG over recruiting NAA agents. I am not sure many of us would care about this.
What is the point you are trying to make about the lady in the You Tube pitch? Was she formerly with NAA or something? Don't assume all of us in the forum are intimately familiar with NAA figureheads.
The legal hassle appears to be NAA fighting EMG over recruiting NAA agents. I am not sure many of us would care about this.
What is the point you are trying to make about the lady in the You Tube pitch? Was she formerly with NAA or something? Don't assume all of us in the forum are intimately familiar with NAA figureheads.