- 14,808
"Need A Quote Now" is far too large - distracting and cheapens the site.
My Life Insurance Website is LIVE! Finally!
- Thread starter dadkins131
- Start date
-
- Tags
- life insurance website
dadkins...why would you get defensive because someone give you their opinion? If you don't get criticism, how are you going to improve your site?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Also, I agree that you need to get "
Copyright © 2010. EdisonLifeBrokerage.com.
Another Masterpiece by Malcolm Campbell "
taken off. Why would he even think it's OK to put that on a paying customer's site?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Also, I agree that you need to get "
Copyright © 2010. EdisonLifeBrokerage.com.
Another Masterpiece by Malcolm Campbell "
taken off. Why would he even think it's OK to put that on a paying customer's site?
Last edited:
- 14,808
- Thread starter
- #15
dadkins131
Expert
- 59
Also, I agree that you need to get "
Please read the original quote... he got sarcastic for no reason, then edited his post. I appreciate feedback, but obviously I don't know alot about all of this.
Also, thanks for the feedback everyone, i made changes to start here button as suggested....it was pretty ugly!
I am no expert, but it looks good to me.
American Seniors Insurance
www.americanseniors.com
National Medicare Supplements
www.nationalmedicaresupplements.com
Medicare Supplement Insurance Quotes - Compare Plans Online medicare supplement insurance
American Seniors - Medicare Supplement Insurance Quotes medicare supplemental insurance medigap
Last edited:
- 7,790
Dadkins, I think courtesy week is in effect and you have violated it. Ther moderator will bust your a$$! Also, I would be leery of any website where there is no contact information with a physical address. Just sayin'.
- Staff
- #18
- 518
I just noticed this post. Thanks for public mention.
Website loading time is indeed an important part of overall website optimization, and it received more value during the Google Caffeine update and its true effects came to light on the Mayday update. That's the reason I place more emphasis on quicker pageloads. Although it still is not the most important factor, its still a strong signal that is sent to Google when they calculate the value of your site/pages..
But the reason of CSS validation errors, is that the site in question is using advanced CSS3 properties which should probably help in the long term regarding validation specifics. The W3C validator is still using the industry standard CSS 2.1 and not CSS3 as this site.
While I don't encourage using Joomla, that site looks nice on the eye, it's pretty straightforward, although it still needs some work here and there. One example, some links are dead.
Off to watch the Germany - Aussies match.
Val.
jeremyeast
Expert
- 96
Pingdom Tools
that is the link I use to measure speed and yours is actually slow. joomla has plugins for caching which you can use to cut the load time significantly.
otherwise the site is pretty attractive. I saw a load time of almost 12 seconds for all page elements.
that is the link I use to measure speed and yours is actually slow. joomla has plugins for caching which you can use to cut the load time significantly.
otherwise the site is pretty attractive. I saw a load time of almost 12 seconds for all page elements.
- 14,808
Just a comment: Unless a page is painfully slow to load I see zero relevance in a page's loading time. Google's "job" is to show me the most relevant pages according to my search.
If a certain site is indeed the most relevant I frankly don't care how fast it loads. I'd hate for it to be placed below a less relevant but faster site.
I don't know how much weight site speed is given, but again - unless it's painfully slow it should be near zero.
If a certain site is indeed the most relevant I frankly don't care how fast it loads. I'd hate for it to be placed below a less relevant but faster site.
I don't know how much weight site speed is given, but again - unless it's painfully slow it should be near zero.
