Colombianking49
Expert
- 34
The neighbor's house was the origin of a fire but because my house was to close the fire came on to my roof and the back wall. There is no insurance on my house. The structure is fine but the water damage is a lot! The insurance company for the neighbor is saying they are not at fault because there was no malice on the part of the neighbor. The fire report states that they are unable to determine the cause of the fire because the house is not safe for them to conclude their investigation.
I'm looking into a lawyer to handle the case... Is it true if the fire was not done in malice that the insurance will not have to pay?
I'm looking into a lawyer to handle the case... Is it true if the fire was not done in malice that the insurance will not have to pay?
Last edited: